期刊文献+

重疾险给付条件:合理性和再设定 被引量:1

The Condition of Claiming Critical Diseases:Rationality and Re-establishment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重大疾病险给付条款所依据的医疗技术规范和确诊标准落后,无法体现目前医学界普遍通行的确诊要求,与现实的治疗手段相差甚远,不符合使重疾险被保险人能够在身患重大疾病时得到一些经济上补偿的初衷。保险公司为了规范给付的标准,或者出于约束自己责任的目的,不能简单地以“首次罹患”为给付条件,应从多方面进行考虑;要明确确定所承保的疾病范围和疾病定义;给付标准应清晰、严谨、准确并符合医学标准。 After the establishment medical treatment techniques and standards of claiming critical diseases, it' s found that it can' t reveal the requirement of normal operation, which is far away from the practical medical methods. It doesn' t suit the original idea of give economic redemption to people with critical diseases. In order to standardize the claiming policy or limit their responsibility, insurance companies should not base on the condition of "initial suffering", it should consider different aspects, and set clear definition of different diseases; Claming standard should be clear, prudent, and accurate and comply with medical standards.
作者 粟芳 常海波
出处 《广东金融学院学报》 2007年第3期78-82,共5页 Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
关键词 重大疾病保险 给付条件 合理性 Critical Diseases' Insurance Claiming Condition Rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1粟芳."重疾险"为何纠纷多[J].大众医学,2005,(3).
  • 2[2]仇兆燕.患病率低限制多,医生质疑重大疾病保险[N].北京娱乐信报.2006-03-06.
  • 3袭法祖.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.321.
  • 4[5]聂晶.重大疾病保险能保多大,理赔尺度将略微放宽[N]中华工商时报,2006-08-16.
  • 5[6]史丽萍.重大疾病保险创始人建议可按疾病严重程度理赔[N].广州日报,2006-11-03.

共引文献2

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部