期刊文献+

英汉论辩语篇说理策略、论辩有效性及诉求手段对比修辞研究 被引量:7

A Contrastive Rhetorical Study of Reasoning Strategies,Strength of Argument & Persuasive Appeals in Chinese and English Argumentative Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以对比修辞学为理论框架,结合西方论辩研究的最新成果,运用ANOVA方差分析,从说理策略、论辩的有效性及诉求手段等多角度探讨和分析英汉论辩语篇的修辞特征,旨在丰富英汉对比修辞研究成果,并为跨文化写作研究提供新视角和有益参考。 Using contrastive rhetoric as its theoretical framework and integrating the latest achievements in argumentation research in English-speaking countries, this study adopts ANOVA as an analytical tool and makes a dynamic multi-dimensional exploration into reasoning strategies, strength of argument and persuasive appeals in Chinese and English argumentative writing. The findings from this project can help enrich contrastive rhetoric study and offer fresh research prospects and useful reference for cross-cultural writing research.
作者 夏莉
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 北大核心 2007年第3期75-78,共4页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 对比修辞 英汉论辩语篇 说理策略 论辩有效性 诉求手段 contrastive rhetoric Chinese vs. English argumentative discourses reasoning strategies strength of argument persuasive appeals
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Coe,Richard M.& Hu Shuzhong.A Tentative Contrastive Study of English and Chinese Rhetoric[J].Foreign Language,1989,(2):44-45.
  • 2Connor,U.& J.Lauer.Understanding Persuasive Essay writing:Linguistic/Rhetorical Approach[J].Text,1985,5(4):309-326.
  • 3Connor,U.Argumentative Patterns in Students' Essays:Cross-Cultural Differences[A].In Connor,U.& R.Kaplan (eds.).Writing Across Languages:Analysis of L2 Text[C].Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley,1987.57 -71.
  • 4Connor,U.& R.B.Kaplan,Writing Across Languages:Analysis of L2 Text[J].Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley,1987.
  • 5Connor,U.& J.Lauer,Cross-Cultural Variation in Persuasive Student Writing[A].In A.C.Purves (ed.).Writing Across Languages and Cultures:Issues in Contrastive Rhetoric[C].Newbury Park,CA:Sage,1988.138 -159.
  • 6Connor,U.Examining Syntactic Variation Across tThree English-Speaking nNationalities Through a Multi-Feature/Multi-Dimensional Approach[A].In D.L.Rubin(ed.).Composing Social Identity in Written Language[C].Hill,N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum,1995:75-88.
  • 7Hinds,J.Inductive,Deductive,QuasiInductive:Expository Writing in Japanese,Korean,Chinese,and Thai[A].In U.Connor & A.M.Johns (eds.).Coherenc e in Writing:Research and Pedagogical Perspectives[C].Alexandria,VA:Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages,1990.89-109.
  • 8Kaplan,R.B.Cultural Thought Pattern in Inter-Cultural Education[J].Language Learning,1966,(1):1-20.
  • 9Matalene,C.Contrastive Rhetoric:An American Writing Teacher in China[J].College English,1985,(47):789 -806.
  • 10Toulmin,S.E.The Uses of Argument[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1958.

共引文献266

同被引文献110

引证文献7

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部