期刊文献+

取决于行政任务的不确定法律概念定性——再问行政裁量概念的界定 被引量:31

The Indefinite Concept of Law Inferred from Administrative Tasks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不确定法律概念是否属于行政裁量,直接影响到作为行政法“重镇”的行政裁量概念的建构与导控。分析显示,不确定法律概念内在的事实张力,否定了不确定法律概念的适用属于纯粹法律问题的设想。而对德国不确定法律概念学说脉络的回顾,更透视出行政任务的变迁对不确定法律概念与行政裁量分分合合的主导作用。由此可见,我国的行政法学应以我国政府当下面临的主要行政任务为切入点,选择包含不确定法律概念的“统一裁量理论”。 The exercising rule and supervision of administrative discretion power has long been the focal point in the research field of administrative law. Authority scope of administrative discretion and the shift of its guiding and controlling route obviously indicate the different tasks of administrative power and the change of relevant fundamental theories of administrative law and constitutional theories. The analysis shows the dividing line between the indefinite concept and the administrative discretion, coming of the judgment on whether the indefinite concept is question of fact or law in theory. The bipartite structure comprising the centre of the concept of law and the borderline of the concept of law, makes the concept of law indefinite. The indefinite space, large or small, on the borderline of the concept of law or even on the centre of the concept of law, results in the common character of the indefinite concept of law-polysemy, which indicates the applying of the indefinite concept of law certainly includes the course of choosing the most appropriate meaning to the specific case. The inherent factual intension of the indefinite concept of law denials the assumption that its applying is a pure legal problem. By sorting out the doctrines and practice of state administrative discretion in major countries under the rule of law such as Germany, we can find that the connotation and denotation of administrative discretion depends on the current situation and development trend of administrative tasks. In view of this, the paper defines China's administrative discretion on the basis of major administrative tasks at present, and puts forward a definition of administrative discretion in a broad sense, including essential condition discretion and effect discretion. The innovativeness of this idea is that it uncovers the inherent relation between the definition of administrative discretion and the orientation of administrative power, thus bringing about the factual background of regulation environment and structure with regard to the characteristic of individual cases in administrative discretion.
作者 郑春燕
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第3期166-174,共9页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20060400012)
关键词 不确定法律概念 行政裁量 行政任务 the indefinite concept of law administrative discretion administrative task
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Yutaka Arai-Takahashi.Discretion in German Administrative Law:Doctrinal Discourse Revisited[J].European Public Law,2000,(6):69-80.
  • 2Craig,P.P.Administrative Law[M].London:Thomson Sweet & Maxwell,2003.
  • 3张桐锐.从'判断余地'理论谈司法审查的界限.宪政时代,1995,(3):69-79.
  • 4桑本谦.法律解释的困境[J].法学研究,2004,26(5):3-13. 被引量:199
  • 5[德]卡尔·拉伦兹 陈爱娥译.法学方法论[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1996.186.
  • 6Niklas,Luhmann.The Unity of Legal System[A].Teubner,G.Autopoietic Law:A New Approach to Law and Society[C].Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,1987.12-35.
  • 7陈春生.行政法之学理与体系(一)[M].台北:三民书局,1996.
  • 8罗伯特·阿列克西.法律论证理论[M].舒国滢,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
  • 9陈慈阳.行政裁量及不确定法律概念[A].台湾"行政法学会".行政法争议问题研究:上[C].台北:五南图书出版有限公司,2001.449-472.
  • 10汉斯·J.沃尔夫 奥托·巴霍夫 等.行政法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002..

二级参考文献32

  • 1胡亚球,陈迎.论行政自由裁量权的司法控制[J].法商研究,2001,18(4):55-63. 被引量:35
  • 2杨仁寿.《法学方法论》[M].台湾三民书局,1987年版.第123页.
  • 3[德]拉伦兹 陈爱娥译.《法学方法论》[M].台湾五图南出版有限公司,1997年版.第245页以下.
  • 4郑戈.《法律解释的社会构造》[A].梁治平主编.《法律解释问题》[C].法律出版社,1998年版.第85页以下.
  • 5.《法律解释学的转向与实用法学的第三条道路》[A]..《法哲学法社会学论丛》第4卷[C].中国政法大学出版社,2001年版..
  • 6[美]博登海默 邓正来.《法理学、法律哲学及其方法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1999年版.第403页.
  • 7波斯纳 苏立.《法律理论的前沿》[M].中国政法大学出版社,2003年版.第250页以下.
  • 8苏力.《解释的难题.对几种法律解释方法的追问》[A].梁治平主编.《法律解释问题》[C].法律出版社,1998年版.第32页.
  • 9R Alexy and R. Dreier, Statutory Interpretation in the Federal Republic of Ger many;Robert S. Summers, Statutory Interpretation in the United State, in Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers ( eds. ) , Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, Dartmouth, 1991.
  • 10Karl N Llewellyn, Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision, 50 Vanderbilt Law Review, pp. 401 - 406.

同被引文献373

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部