摘要
研究探讨了小学7、9、11岁儿童在对说谎与说真话进行道德评价时不同情景间的差异。研究结果发现,小学儿童对于具有积极意义的说谎/真话的评价显著地好于消极性的说谎/真话。但在对具有积极意义的说谎以及具有消极意义的真话进行评价时,具有显著的情景间差异。总的来说,在个体情景下,对谦虚谎及做好事说真话的评价具有年龄的效应,且谦虚谎的评价比白谎更为积极,而白谎的评价比集体情景下的说谎与伤害性说谎更为积极;而儿童对于交往情景下直率真话的评价在所有的年龄都趋于中性,有别于其他情景。
This study investigated the situation effect on children＇s moral evaluation of lies and truths in 7, 9 and 11 years of age. Results revealed that all children evaluated lies or truths with positive meaning better than lies or truths with negative meaning in all situations. But in individual situation, there were age effects in the evaluation of modesty lie and pro-social truth, and children better for modesty lie than white lie, while the evaluation of white lie was better than lie in collective situation and lie to hurt someone. The evaluation of blunt truth-telling was getting neutral as the age increased, that was different from truths in other situations.
出处
《心理发展与教育》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期1-5,13,共6页
Psychological Development and Education
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金
教育部重点项目(106025)资助
关键词
说谎/说真话
儿童
道德评价
情景因素
lying/truth-telling
moral evaluation
situation effect
children
