期刊文献+

81例局部晚期鼻咽癌放疗的临床研究 被引量:7

Three schemes of radiation therapy for eight-one local-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察3种不同治疗方案对局部晚期鼻咽癌的临床疗效、急性反应和晚期损伤。方法初治鼻咽癌81例,其中Ⅲ期50例,ⅣA期31例。单纯放疗组(RT)30例,常规放疗加化疗组(RT+CT)33例,调强放疗加化疗组18例(IMRT+CT)。常规放疗鼻咽部剂量70~76 Gy,肿大淋巴结60~65 Gy,颈部预防剂量50 Gy;调强放疗设鼻咽大体肿瘤为GTV(nx)、颈部阳性淋巴结GTV(nd)、高危临床靶体积CTV1和低危临床靶体积CTV2。处方剂量分别为GTV(nx) 70.6~76.6 Gy分31~33次、GTV(nd) 61.6~70.6 Gy分28~33次、CTV1 60 Gy分28次、CTV2 53.2 Gy分28次,化疗方案包括诱导、同期与辅助。生存率用Kaplan-Meier法计算,Logrank检验,RTOG或EORTC标准评价急性反应和晚期损伤。结果中位随访时间21.5个月,全组2和3年局部区域无进展、无远处转移生存率、总生存率分别为90%、85%、86%和83%、83%、83%;RT组分别为63%、82%、65%和52%、76%、60%;RT +CT组分别为76%、83%、77%和73%、83%、60%;IMRT+CT组分别为100%、94%、100%和89%、94%、100%。RT组与RT+CT组生存差异无统计学意义(X^2=0.53,P=0.473),RT组与IMRT+CT组生存差异有统计学意义(X^2=7.42,P=0.007),RT+CT组与IMRT+CT组生存比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=5.06,P=0.028)。全组多数患者仅表现为1~2级急性反应和0~1级晚期损伤,RT组1例出现放射性脑病。放疗后1年中重度口干发生率RT组和RT+CT组总计92%,而IMRT+CT组仅表现为轻度口干。结论IMRT加化疗对局部晚期鼻咽癌患者可获得理想的局部区域控制和总生存率;IMRT可明显减轻放疗引发的口干。 Objective To present the preliminary results of three different radiotherapy schemes for 81 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to observe the acute and late normal tissue toxicities. Methods Between Jan, 2002 and Dec ,2005,81 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated in our department, 50 patients had stage Ⅲ while 31 patients had stage IVA lesion. They were divided into 3 groups: conventional radiation group(RT) 30 patieents; conventional radiation combined with chemotherapy group (RT + CT), 33 patients; and intensity modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy group( IMRT + CT), 18 patients. The conventional radiation consisted of a prescription dose of 70-76 Gy to the target in the nasopharynx. For IMRT, the prescription dose delivered to the gross tumor volume in the nasopharynx (GTV) varied from 70.6-76.6 Gy/31-33f; 61.6-70.6 Gy/28-33f to the positive neck lymph nodes (GTVnd) ; to the high risk regions(CTV1 ) 60 Gy/28F; and low risk regions(CTV2) 53.2 Gy/28F. Chemotherapy included, induction, concurrent and adjuvant protocols. Kaplan-Meier method was used for local-regional progression-free rate, distant metastasis-free rate,and overall survival. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to RTOG radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Results With a median follow-up of 21.5 months (range 5-49), the overall 2- and 3-year estimated local-regional progression-free survival rates, distant metastasis-free survival rate and overall survival rate was 90% ,85% ,86% and 83% ,83% ,83%, respectively. In RT group, was 63% ,82% ,65% and 52% ,76% ,60%, respectively. In RT + CT group, it was 76% ,83% ,77% and 73% ,83% ,60% respectively. For IMRT + CT group, it was 100% ,94% ,100% and 89% ,94%, 100% respectively. IMRT + CT group had significantly higher overall survival rate than RT group ( X^2 = 7.42, P = 0. 007 ) and RT + CT group ( X^2 = 5.06, P = 0. 028 ). However, the difference between RT group and RT + CT group in the overall survival was insignificant( X^2 = 0.53 ,P =0. 437). Most patients in all groups had grade 1-2 acute and Grade 0-1 late toxicities, one year later after radiotherapy, the moderate and high grade of xerostomia rate was 92% in RT and RT + CT groups. In IMRT + CT group, it had been only slight xerostomia. Conclusion IMRT plus chemotherapy may be able to improve the local-region control and overall survival for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiation, xerostomia can obviously be decreased by IMRT.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期169-173,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤/化学疗法 鼻咽肿瘤/放射疗法 调强放疗 预后 Nasopharyngeal neoplasm/chemotherapy Nasopharyngeal neoplasm/radiotherapy Intensity modulated radiation therapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Chua DT,Sham JS,Kwong DL,et al. Treatment outcome after radiotherapy alone for patients with StageⅠ-Ⅱ nasopharyngeal carcinoma .Cancer, 2003, 98 :74-80 .
  • 2Chua DT,Sham JS,Wei WI,et al. The predictive value of the 1997 American Joint Co mmittee on Cancer stage classification in determining failure patterns in nasopharyngeal carcinoma .Cancer, 2001, 92 :2845-2855 .
  • 3Chow E,Payne D,O Sullivan B,et al. Radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer:comparison with an intergroup study,Is combined modality treatment really necessary? .Radiother Oncol. 2002, 63 :269-274 .
  • 4严洁华 徐国镇 见:殷蔚伯 谷铣之主编.鼻咽癌[A].见:殷蔚伯,谷铣之主编.肿瘤放射治疗学[C].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002.559-562.
  • 5William W,Jonathan ST. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma .Seminar. 2005, 365 :20541-2054 .
  • 6International nasopharynx cancer study group. Preliminary results of a randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy(cis—platin, epirubicin,bleomycin)plus radiotherapy vs.Radiotherapy alone in stage Ⅳ(>or=N2,MO)undifferentiated naso—pharyngeal carcinoma .Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996, 35 :463-469 .
  • 7Chua DT, Sham JS, Choy D, et al. Preliminaryrepo - of the Asian Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association ran domized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of pa tients with Iocoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. (Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association Nasopharynx Cancer Study Group). Cancer, 1998, 83 : 2270- 2283.
  • 8Chua DT,Ma J,Sham JS,et al. Long-term survival after cisplatinbased induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a pooled data analysis of two phase Ⅲ trails .J Clin Oncol, 2005, (23) :1059-1060 .
  • 9Ma BB,Chan AT. Recent perapectives in the role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma .Cancer, 2005, 103 :22-31 .
  • 10Lee AW,Tung SY,Chan AT. Preliminary results of a randomized study(NPC-9902 Trial)on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma .Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 66 :142-151 .

二级参考文献16

  • 1赵充.鼻咽癌调强适形放疗进展[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2004,19(4):281-284. 被引量:39
  • 2Xia P,Fu KK,Wong GW,et al.Comparision of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:329-337.
  • 3Balogh JM,Sutherland SE.Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible:a review.J Otolaryngol,1989,18:245-250.
  • 4Cooper JS,Fu K,Marks J,et al.Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1995,31:1141-1164.
  • 5Langendijk JA,Leemans ChR,Buter J,et al.The Additional Value of Chemotherapy to Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:a Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature.J Clin Oncol,2004,22:4604-4612.
  • 6Marks JE,Bedwinek JM,Lee F,et al.Dose-response analysis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a historical perspective.Cancer,1982,50:1042-1050.
  • 7Vikram B,Mishra UB,Strong EW,et al.Patterns of failure in carcinoma of the nasopharynx:I.Failure at the primary site.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1985,11:1455-1459.
  • 8Sultanem K,Shu HK,Xia P,et al.Three dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy n the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:the university of California-San Francisco experiences.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:711-722.
  • 9Lee N,Xia P,Quivey JM,et al.Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:An update of the UCSF experience.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,53:12-22.
  • 10Butler EB,Teh BS,Grant WH,et al.SMART (Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiation Therapy) boost:a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy.Int J Radtat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45:21-32.

共引文献178

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部