期刊文献+

基于药物毒性反应等级的Up-and-Down设计(英文) 被引量:1

Incorporating Toxicity Grade Information in Up-and-Down Design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Ⅰ期临床试验主要关心毒性,通常划分毒性为五个水平.简单起见,同时兼顾伦理问题,Ⅰ期临床试验通常采用up-and-down序贯设计(例如BCDⅠ,BCDⅡ,K-in-a-row,Narayana,Improved Narayana).然而,在分配剂量水平时,该设计没有区分已经试验了的病人的严重毒性水平等级,从而有可能分配给病人更高毒性的剂量水平.因此,本文提出了基于药物毒性等级确定最大耐受剂量的up-and-down设计方法,并进一步研究了该设计方法在各种变化的剂量—毒性关系下的运作特征,并且和标准的up-and-down设计作模拟比较,结果表明该设计方法对Ⅰ期临床试验设计的剂量建议具有重要意义. For phase Ⅰ cancer clinical trials, toxicity is a major concern. Commonly, toxicity is categorized with five levels of severity. A simple sequential design that addresses these ethical concerns is the up-and-down designs (BCD Ⅰ, BCD Ⅱ, k-in-a-row, Narayana, improved Narayana). However, in the up-and-down designs family, the severity level of graded toxicity of a previous patient's response would not be a differentiated factor for the next dose level assignment and doses that are too toxic may also be recommended. In this study, we extend the up-and-down procedure incorporating the idea on the assessments of graded toxicity in the dose escalation. We investigate the operating characteristics of this approach under a variety of dose-toxicity associations and comparison with up-and-down family shows that it can achieve significant improvements to the doses recommended during the phase Ⅰ trial.
出处 《生物数学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期1-12,共12页 Journal of Biomathematics
基金 Foundation item:Research Supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China(10201006 and 10001008)
关键词 剂量响应 毒性研究 Ⅰ期试验 最大耐受剂量 Dose-response Toxicity study Phase Ⅰ trial Maximum tolerated dose(MTD)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Hannan E J, Quinn B G. The determination of the order of an autoregression[J]. J R Statist Soc, 1979,B41(2):190-195.
  • 2Williams D A. The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control[J]. Biometrics, 1972, 28(2):519-531.
  • 3Shirley E. A nonparametric equivalent of Williams'test for contrasting increasing dose levels of a treatment[J].Biometrics, 1977, 33(2):386-389.
  • 4Yanagawa T, Kikuchi Y, Brown K G. No-observed-adverse-effect levels in severity data[J]. JASA, 1997,92(438):449-454.
  • 5Konishi S. Statistical model evaluation and information criteria[J]. in Multivariate analysis, design of experiments and survery sampling[M]. Subir Ghosh (eds). New York: Marcd Dekker Inc, 1999, 369-399.
  • 6Williams D A. A note on Shirley's nonparametric test for comparing several dose levels with a zero-dose control[J]. Biometrics, 1986, 42(1):183-186.

共引文献4

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部