法学博士论文选题创新性实证分析

Empirical Analysis of the Creativity of Legal Science Dissertation Themes Selection

本文数据来源为18年来国内全部刑法、犯罪学博士论文351篇,理论资源为知识社会学和科学哲学,量化分析工具是SPSS,着眼点是科研选题与学术创新之间的关系。结论认为:“竞争型基础研究”在既定范围、领域的科研选题中所占比例即显示学科发展状况的创新系数越高,说明有越多的学术注意力集中到重大基础理论问题的反思和论争上,结果可能预示着学科整体创新的临近。这个系数越低,表明学科的整体发展越稳定,常规研究仍为知识创新的主要形式。

Taking the total 351 domestic dissertations on criminal law and criminology as research subjects and utilizing sociology of knowledge and philosophy of science as theoretical resources, this paper focuses on the relationship between the dissertation themes and the academic creativity with the assistance of SPSS. It is concluded that the higher is the ratio of competitive basic theme in certain academic field, which indicates a higher creativity coefficient of the discipline development condition, the more possible is more attention being paid to reflections and critics on essential theoretic themes, suggesting the approaching of creativity of the whole discipline branch. In the contrast, the lower is the coefficient, the more stable is the discipline development condition, suggesting that routine research is still the mainstream.