期刊文献+

概率的不同表征对贝叶斯推理的影响的研究 被引量:8

Effects of Different Probability Representation on Bayesian Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究以贝叶斯推算、判断为实验任务,探讨了三种概率表征(百分比、自然频率、概率词)、三种概率规则认识水平对贝叶斯推理的影响,结果表明:1)概率词表征的贝叶斯推算实质是判断过程。2)在三种概率表征中,频率表征更适合于正确完成贝叶斯推理,但存在学科背景的差异。3)贝叶斯推理使用的策略有正确规则、错误规则、命题知识、概率简捷式、直觉和个人意愿六种。4)贝叶斯判断的正确率高于贝叶斯推算,个体在贝叶斯判断上使用的正确规则多于贝叶斯推算过程。 The reasoning tasks were Bayesian calculation and judgment to explore the effects of different probability representation, understanding probability rule on the Bayesian inference. The results showed: 1 ) Process of verbal probability format on Bayesian reasoning was judgment. 2) Frequency format was better than other formats, but there was difference among participants of different subject, 3) Strategies of Bayesian reasoning included fight rule, error rule, proposition, probability heuristics, intuition, desire.4) Judgment was better than calculation, right rules of judgment were more than of calculation.
作者 杨莉 胡竹菁
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期32-35,共4页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 贝叶斯推理 概率表征 推理策略 Bayesian reasoning probability representation strategy of reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Edwards W.Conservatism in human information processing.In:B Kleinmuntz,Ed.Formal representation of human judgment.New York:Wiley,1968.17-52.
  • 2Kaheman D,Tversky A.Subjective probability:A judgment of representativeness.Cognitive Psychology,1972,3:430-454.
  • 3Tversky A,Kahneman D.Evidential impact of base rates.In:D Kahneman,D.P.Slovic,A.Tversky,Eds.Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press,1982.153-160.
  • 4Eddy D M.Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine:Problem and opportunities.In:D.Kahneman,P.Slovic,A.Tversky,Eds.Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press,1982.249-267.
  • 5Hoffrage U,Gigerenzer G,Krauss S,et al..Representation facilitates reasoning:what natural frequencies are and what they are not.Cognition,2002,78:47-276.
  • 6Gigerenzer G,Hoffrage U.How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction:Frequency formats.Psychological Review,1995,102:684-704.
  • 7Sloman S A.The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.In:T.Gilovich,et al.,eds.Heuristics and Biases:The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment,Cambridge University Press,2002.397-398.
  • 8Hardman D,Macchi L.Thinking:psychological perspectives on reasoning,judgment and decision making.John Wiley,Sons Ltd,2003.128.
  • 9Windschitl P D.The binary additivity of subjective probability does not indicate the binary complementarity of perceived certainty.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,81:195-225.

同被引文献80

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部