期刊文献+

青少年期母子性格与家庭亲密度的关系:性格喜好的作用 被引量:14

The Association between Mother-adolescent Personalities and Family Intimacy:the Effect of Personality Favor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究旨在考察性格喜好与母子性格、家庭成员亲密度的关系以及性格喜好在其他两个变量之间的中介作用。成都市632对初高中学生及其母亲分别自评并填写了艾森克人格问卷,同时评价喜欢对方性格的程度。另外,青少年还报告了与家庭成员的亲密程度。通过相关分析、多元方差分析、层级回归分析以及结构方程模型建模,结果发现:性格喜好与母亲性格、青少年性格均有显著关系,青少年对母亲的性格喜好程度与家庭成员间的亲密感有显著正相关。青少年性格和青少年对母亲的性格喜好程度能直接预测家庭成员亲密度,同时青少年和母亲的性格还通过青少年对母亲的性格喜好程度间接作用于家庭亲密度,提示性格喜好在二者的关系中发挥了重要的中介作用。 The relationships among personality of mother and adolescent, personality favor and family intimacy was examined among 632 adolescents of 7 - 12 grade and their mothers. Participants completed Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, evaluated the mutual favor to the other's personality, the adolescents also reported the family intimacy. Through correlation, correlation, F - test, multiple hierarchical regression, and SEM, the results revealed that the mutual personality favor has significant relationships with the personalities of both mothers and adolescents, and the personality favor from adolescents to their moters is positive related with the family intimacy significantly. The personalities of adolescents and the degree bow they like their mother's personalities can predict the family intimacy directly, at the same time, the personalities of the adolescents and their mothers can also contribute to the family intimacy indirectly through the personality favor from adolescents to mothers. These findings clue to that the personality favor play an important mediated role between the mother- adolescent personalities and the family intimacy.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期63-68,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究"十五"规划项目(01JAXLX011)
关键词 青少年 母亲 性格 性格喜好 家庭亲密度 adolescent mother personality personality favor family intimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献8063

同被引文献158

引证文献14

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部