期刊文献+

美中商业秘密内涵的思考 被引量:3

Thinking on the Connotation of Trade Secrets between China and the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 从美国商业秘密法的发展来看,商业秘密的内涵呈现出从秘密性、实用性至秘密性、价值性和管理性再至秘密性和价值性的一个变化过程,而我国有关法律及规定明确认为商业秘密在内涵上需要具备秘密性、实用性、价值性和管理性四个构成要件。从两国的规定看,两国对商业秘密内涵的理解在新颖性、实用性、管理性三个方面存在较大分歧。 The connotation of trade secrets in the history of American trade secret laws develops from two elements: secrecy and utility, to three elements: secrecy, value and reasonable safeguards, then to secrecy and value. But under the laws and regulations of China, the connotation of trade secrets contains four elements: secrecy, utility, value and reasonable safeguards. So it is very clear that there are some different understandings in the connotation of the trade secrets between American trade secret laws and Chinese trade secret laws, such as novelty, utility and reasonable safeguards.
作者 王奎
机构地区 湘潭大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期101-105,共5页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 商业秘密 内涵 比较分析 Trade Secrets Connotation Comparative Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1By James W. Hill, Trade Secrets, Unjust Enrichment, and the Classification of Obligations, Virginia Journal of Law and Technology,1999,p3.
  • 2Damon L. Boyd, Trade Secret Doctrines of the NAFTA Countries : the Sources of Law, the remedies Available, and Suggestions for Improvement, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1997 ,p881,882.
  • 3Brandon B. Cate, “Saforo & Associates, Inc. v. Porocel Corp. : The Failure of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act to Clarify the Doubtful and Confused Status of Common Law Trade Secret Principles”, Arkansas Law Review,2000, p699.
  • 4Robert G. Bone, “A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification”, California Law Review, 1998,p247,249.
  • 5Richard A. Epstein, "The Constitutional Protection of Trade Secrets under the Takings Clause", University of Chicago Law Review,2004, p57.
  • 6江苏省高级人民法院2004年1月.《江苏省高级人民法院关于审理商业秘密有关问题的意见》第7条.
  • 7Damon L. Boyd, Trade Secret Doctrines of the NAFTA Countries: the Sources of Law, the remedies Available, and Suggestions for Improvement, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1997, p881,882.

同被引文献54

引证文献3

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部