期刊文献+

英语写作中语篇衔接手段与语篇教学 被引量:5

Textual Cohesion and Textual Teaching in English Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用语言学的统计方法,运用Halliday & Hasan的语篇衔接理论,对364名非英语专业大二本科生所写作文中的好作文与次作文就语篇衔接特点进行了比较分析。此项研究基于如下假设:好作文中的语法衔接与词汇衔接手段的频率分布比次作文中的高。目的是为了探究什么样的衔接手段更利于产生好作文,通过统计方法得出在衔接手段类型中对好作文贡献最大的是词汇衔接,进而指出语篇教学与语篇衔接相结合对英语写作教学有重要的指导意义。 In this paper, an investigation is carried out by using linguistic statistic methods to compare the features of textual cohesion theorized by Halliday &Hasan, between the good and poor compositions written by 364 non-English majors of Chinese college sophomore. It is hypothesized that the frequency distribution of beth grammatical and lexical cohesion is much higher in good writing. The hypothesis is tested and confirmed. Among the cohesive devices, lexical cohesion contributes most to the good writing. Therefore, the combination of textual cohesion and textual teaching will be significant to the teaching of English writing.
作者 崔佳
出处 《山西财经大学学报(高等教育版)》 2007年第2期50-52,共3页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 衔接手段 语篇教学 统计分析 频率分布 cohesive devices textual teaching statistical analysis frequency distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Danes, E Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text[A]. Danes, E Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective[C]. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. 106-128.
  • 2Fies, Peter. On the status of theme in English: argument from discourse[J]. Forum Linguisticum, 1981, 6(1): 1-38.
  • 3Brown, G. & Yule, G. Discourse Analysis [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1983.
  • 4Van Dijk, T. A. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse [M]. London: Longman, 1977.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman, 1976.
  • 6Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Language,Context and Text [M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press, 1985.

共引文献195

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部