摘要
由于环境侵权有其特殊性,且环境侵权诉讼与执行对受害者而言存在一些障碍,因此有必要建立诉前交易制度,即受害者与专业组织之间的交易制度,以便利受害者的救济,促使潜在环境侵权者采用先进技术和设备保护和改善环境。诉前交易系当事人处分自己的私权,因此诉前交易较之刑事诉讼中的辩诉交易应更具可行性。诉前交易与当事人之间的交易各有特点和适用范围,两者既不相互排斥,也不能相互代替,而应在环境侵权救济中发挥各自的作用。
It environmental tort is necessary to build bargaining system between victims and has its particularity and there is barrier for the victims in the tort. The bargaining system can help the victims to get the remedy and spur professional organizations because the appeal and execution of environmental the latent trespassers up to adopt advanced technology and equipment so as to protect and improve environment. The essential of bargaining before appeal is a disposal of private right of party, so the bargaining before appeal is more feasible than plea bargaining in criminal pleal. The bargaining before appeal and the bargaining between parties with each characteristic have different applicable areas and they do not exclude or replace each other. They should play different roles in the remedy of environmental tort.
出处
《云南大学学报(法学版)》
2007年第3期108-113,共6页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
关键词
环境侵权
救济
诉讼
交易
environmental tort
remedy
appeal
bargaining