诉讼费下调的经济分析

Reduced Litigation-costs of Economic Analysis

诉讼费下调本着“司法为民”的理念出发,意图通过此举缓解“打官司难”的问题,其出发点是好的,路径选择未必正确。其忽视了诉讼费仅是当事人诉讼成本的一部分,单纯减少诉讼费表面上促使了当事人参与诉讼,但同时增加了当事人的讼累,造成案件的急剧增加,致使已处困境的法院更加难以解脱。长久来看,诉讼费下调未必对民众有利,也未必对国家有利。

reduced costs of ＂Justice for the people＂ concept, intended to ease through this ＂difficult litigation. ＂ Its starting point is good, the path chosen is not necessarily correct. Ignored its legal fees only person in litigation costs, simply to reduce costs apparently prompted the parties involved in litigation, while increasing the party＇s advocacy tired. The cases resulting from the sharp increase was the result of the court in distress relief more difficult. Long term, the costs may not be reduced for public benefit, it may not be beneficial to the country.