期刊文献+

ICU与非ICU铜绿假单胞菌感染的耐药性对比研究 被引量:5

Drug Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Intensive Care Unit and Non-intensive Care Unit:A Comparative Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对比重症监护病房(ICU)与非ICU铜绿假单胞菌的细菌耐药性,为临床合理用药提供依据。方法 采用ATB细菌鉴定仪,对铜绿假单胞菌进行检测,药敏试验用K-B纸片法,根据2005年美国临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)标准判断结果,应用WHONET5软件对临床分离细菌的药敏结果进行数据统计分析。结果 ICU分离菌对亚胺培南和美罗培南耐药率为41.4%和43.0%,分别高于非ICU 33.3%和33.6%(P〈0.05),对左氧氟沙星、哌拉西林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、环丙沙星、氨曲南、阿米卡星的耐药率高于非ICU 8.6%-32.2%(P〈0.05),ICU与非ICU对抗菌药物耐药率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 ICU铜绿假单胞菌耐药性显著高于非ICU,尤其是碳青酶烯类抗菌药物,应引起临床医师的高度重视。 OBJECTIVE To compare the drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units(ICU)and non-ICU for the guidance of clinical rational use of antimicrobial drugs. METHODS The P. aeruginosa isolates were detected by ATB microbiological system, and the antibiotics susceptivity by Kirby-Bauer(K-B)test. The results were evaluated based on National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards(NCCLS) in 2005. The data were analyzed by using WHONET-5 software. RESULTS The resistant rate of P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU to imipenem and meropenem was 41.2% and 43.0%, respectively, higher than from non-ICU (33.0% and 33.6%) (P〈0. 005). The resistant rate of P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU to levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, aztreonam, and amikacin (8. 6-32.2%) were higher than from non-ICU (P〈0. 005). There was significant difference between the resistant rate of ICU and non-ICU to antimicrobial drugs (P(0.005). CONCLUSIONS The drug resistance of P. aeruginosa isolated from ICU patients to many antimicrobial drugs was higher than from non-ICU patients, especially to carbapenems. Close attention should be taken by the clinical doctors.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期602-604,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 铜绿假单胞菌 耐药性 抗菌药物 重症监护病房 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drug resistances Antimicrobial drugs Intensive care units
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Masuda N,Sakagawa E,Ohya S. Outer membrane proteins responsible for multiple drug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1995, 39(3): 645-649.
  • 2[2]Poole K. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoroquinolones in Gram-negative bacteria[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2000, 44(9): 2233-2241.
  • 3[3]Nikaido H. Antibiotic resistance caused by Gram-negative multidrug efflux pumps[J]. Clin Infest Dis, 1998, 27(Suppl 1): S32-S41.
  • 4[4]Srikamar R, Li XZ, Poole K. Inner membrane efflux components are responsible for β-lactam specificity of efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. J Bacteriol, 1997, 179(24): 7875-7881.
  • 5[5]Dekievit TR, Parkins MD, Gillis RJ, et al. Multidrug efflux pumps: expression patterns and contribution to antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2001, 45(6): 1761-1770.
  • 6[6]Masuda N, Sakagawa E, Ohya ST, et al. Hypersusceptibility of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nfxB mutant to β-lactam due to reduced expression of the ampC β-lactamase[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2001, 45(4): 1284-1286.
  • 7[7]Kohler T, Epp SF, Curty LK, et al. Characterization of mexT, the regular of the mex-EmexF-oprN multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. J Bacteriol, 1999, 181(20): 6300-6305.
  • 8[8]Zhao Q, Li XZ, Srikumar R,et al. Contribution of outer membrane efflux protein oprM to antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1998, 43(7): 1682-1688.
  • 9[9]Mao W, Warren MS, Lee AO, et al.MexXY-OprM efflux pump is required for antagonism of aminoglycosides by divalent cations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2001, 45(7): 2001-2007.
  • 10[10]Lee A, Mao W, Warren MS. Interplay between efflux pumps may provide either additive or multiplicative effects on drug resistance[J]. J Bacteriol, 2000, 182(11): 3142-3150.

共引文献368

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部