期刊文献+

解释与证据:基于估值理念差异下的A股与H股价差 被引量:7

Price Difference between H Share and A Share Based on the Difference in Value Ideas:Interpretation and Evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于Collings(1997)的估值模型对29家A+H股公司财务信息与两地股价相关性的检验表明:以财务信息为基础的估值模型对H股股价的解释力度优于A股,H股估值较A股合理。进一步的研究发现:会计盈余、现金股利、A股流通股比例与H股相对于A股的折让率呈负相关关系。这些研究结果支持了一个新论点,即A股市场与H股市场存在估值理念差异,这种差异是A+H股公司两地股价差异的重要成因。 Based on the Valuation Models of Collings (1997), the paper tests the finance information's value correlation of the 29 A + H share listed companies. The empirical results show that, the H share's Goodness of fit of the two value models based on the finance information is far better than A share's, which indicates that the price of H share is more reasonable than A share. Furthermore research shows that, accounting earnings, the cash dividends and the negotiable A share ratios is negative to the A to H share discounts. These empirical results provide a new explanation that the discrepancy in the value idea between A share market and H share market is the main factor which affectthe price difference of A+ H companies.
作者 吴战篪
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期16-23,共8页 Finance & Economics
关键词 估值理念 价差 净资产 会计盈余 折让率 value idea price difference net assets accounting earnings discount
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1]Bailey, W., 1994, Risk and return on China's new stock markets: Some preliminary evidence, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2,243-260.
  • 2[2]Wo, C.S., 1997. Chinese dual-class equities: price differentials and information flows. Emerg. Market. Q.Summer 1997,47-62.
  • 3[3]Chen, Y., Su, Y., 1998. An examination into market segmentation in the Chinese stock market. Adv. Pac. Basin Financ. Market 4,49-70
  • 4[4]Chakravarty, S., Sarkar, A.,Wu,L.,1998.Information asymmetry, market segmentation and the pricing of cross-listed share: theory and evidence from Chinese A and B shares, Research Paper No. 9820,Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • 5[5]Fernald, J., Rogers, J.H., 1998. Puzzles in the Chinese Stock Market, International finance discussion paper No. 619, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
  • 6[6]Gordan, R.G., Li, W., 1999. Government as a Discriminating Monopolist in the Financial Market: the case of China, NBER working paper No. 7110, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • 7[7]Solnik, B.H., 1974. The international pricing of risk: an empirical investigation of the world capital market structure. Journal of Finance 29, 365-377.
  • 8王国刚著.《中国资本市场的深层问题》[M].,社会科学文献出版社2004年版..
  • 9滕泰.《信心怎可失,谁来主导中国股市定价权》[N].上海证券报,2004年11月1513.
  • 10陈雪 易非 黄立锋.《估值:寻找中国标尺》[EB/OL].《中证网》,2004年10月28日.

共引文献375

同被引文献77

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部