期刊文献+

腰硬联合麻醉用于分娩镇痛的临床观察 被引量:7

Clinical observation on effect of CSEA in labor painkilling.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛的效果及对产程、母婴的影响。方法:将80例产妇随机分为观察组和对照组两组,观察组(40例)在蛛网膜下腔隙注入芬太尼15μg,PCEA用0.1%罗哌卡因+芬太尼2μg/m l,6 m l/h。对照组(40例)不行镇痛。观察两组镇痛效果、运动神经阻滞、产程时间、分娩方式、新生儿Apgar评分情况。结果:观察组镇痛效果明显优于对照组(Hc=35.79,P<0.01),无运动神经阻滞,活跃期明显缩短(t=5.21,P<0.01),两组剖宫产率和新生儿Apgar评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.5)。结论:腰硬联合麻醉用于分娩镇痛效果确切,不影响产程及新生儿。 Objective: To explore the effect of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor painkilling and its influence on labor course and mother and infants. Methods:80 cases premature intant were divided into 2 groups randomly, observation group (40 cases) was injected with fentanyl 15 μg, after turning and lie horizontally, given 0.1% ropivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl epidurally and conduct PCEA, infusion speed 6 ml/h; comparison group (40 cass) did not adopt the treatment of labor painkilling. The effect of painkilling and blocking, the duration of total labor course, the mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar scores were observed. Results: Observation group was better in labor painkilling than comparison group obviously (Hc=35.79, P〈0.01) and no blocking. The active time was shorter obviously(t=5.21,P〈0.01) .There was no significant difference in the two groups in the rates of cesarean section and neonatal Apgar scores (P〉0.05). Conclusion: CSEA is sure, effect in labor painkilling and has no influence on delivery course and neonates.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第16期2228-2229,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 分娩镇痛 罗哌卡因 芬太尼 CSEA Labor painkilling Ropivacaine Fentanyl
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Paech MJ.Epidural analgesia in labour:constant infusion plus patientcontrolled boluses.Anesth Intens Care,1991,19:32.
  • 2D'Angolo R.New techniques for labor analgesia PCEA and CSE.Clin Obstet Gynecol,2003,46(3):623.
  • 3陈治军,田玉科,张咸伟,张传汉,李新华,汤红.罗哌卡因复合芬太尼用于可行走硬膜外分娩镇痛的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(12):727-729. 被引量:63
  • 4Tsen LT,Thue B,Datta S et al.Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology,1999,91(4):920.
  • 5张立生,刘小立.现代疼痛学.第1版.石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,1998.557.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Benhamou D,Hamza J,Eledjam JJ,et al.Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2mg.ml ’ for pain relief during labor[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1997
  • 2Breen TW,Shapiro T,Glass B,et al.Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.1993
  • 3Eddleston JM,Holland JJ,Griffin RP,et al.A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labor[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1996
  • 4Bloom SL,Mclntire DD,Kelly MA,et al.Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1998
  • 5Meister GC,D’ Angelo R,Owen MD,et al.A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.2000
  • 6Douglas MJ.Walking epidural analgesia in labor[].Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia.1998

共引文献62

同被引文献31

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部