期刊文献+

低调陈述的认知视角 被引量:3

A Cognitive Perspective of Understatement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从认知语言学的角度论证低调陈述是常规语言的表达变体和视角选择,其本质属性是对立,反映了说话人的期待与现实之间的对立,是人们内心世界与外部世界相互交流的异化操作。文章还分析了低调陈述现象的标记性,语义原型范畴等方面。我们试图证明,从认知语言学角度来研究低调陈述,有助于我们进一步拓宽对低调陈述的传统研究,加深我们理解人们是如何从语言的角度对世界进行概念化以及语言和认知的深层关系。 This paper is a tentative study of understatement from a cognitive perspective. Understatement, presenting something as less significant than it is, is motivated by cognitive, linguistic, and social factors and reflects the idea of a speaker providing some contrast between expectation and reality. Therefore, understatement can be characterized by semantic reversal. The paper also analyses such aspects as the markedness and the semantic prototype. Our discussion shows that a cognitive approach to the study of understatement may broaden our understanding of the issue in question, and further our comprehension of how language conceptualizes the external world and of the underlying relationship between language and cognition.
作者 鞠红
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 2007年第2期13-16,共4页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 2007年度安徽大学人才队伍建设经费资助
关键词 低调陈述 对立 标记性 语义原型 understatement reversals of expectations markedness semantic prototype
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1[1]Bates,E.Pragmatics and socio-linguistics in child language[A].In D.Morehead & A.Morehead (Eds).Normal and Deficient Child Language[C].Baltimore:University Park Press,1976:411-464.
  • 2[2]Carney,L.S.Not telling us what to think:The Vietnam veterans memorial[J].Metaphor & Symbol,1993 (8/ 3):9-211.
  • 3[3]Cavanagh,M.E.Cognitive development:Pastoral implications[J].Pastoral Psychology,1996 (44/4):10-227.
  • 4[4]Clark,H.The primitive nature of children's relational concepts[A].In J.Hayes(ed.).Cognition and the Development of Language[C].New York:Wiley,1970:11-54.
  • 5[5]Clark,H.H.Using Language[M].Cambridge:CUP,1996.
  • 6[6]Colston,H.L.& J.O'Brien.Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language:Anything understatement can do,irony can do better[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2000(32/11):1557-1583.
  • 7[7]Dews,S.& Winner,E.Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meaning in verbal irony[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1999(31):1579-1599.
  • 8[8]Fauconnier,G.Mapping in Thought and Language[M].Cambridge:CUP,1997.
  • 9[9]Frith,C.D.The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia[M].Hove,UK:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1992.
  • 10[10]Gibbs,R.W.The Poetics of Mind:Figurative Thought,Language,and Understanding[M].New York:CUP,1994.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Searle, J. Indirect Speech Acts [A]. In Cole, P & J Morgan (eds).Syntax Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 2Ungerer, F & H J Schmid. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Addison Wesley Longman limited, 1996.
  • 3Wittgenstein, L Philosophical Investigations [M]. Transl By G E M Anscobe, 2nd ed. Oxford : Blackwell, 1958.
  • 4Berlin, B & P Kay. Basic Color Terms, Their Universality and Evolution [M]. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.
  • 5Cordon, D & G Lakoff. Conversational Postulates [A]. In Cole, P &J Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts [C].New York : Academic Press, 1975.
  • 6Levinson, S. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1983.
  • 7Mey, L. Pragmatics : An Introduction [ M ]. Blackwell Publishers Ltd,2001.
  • 8Rosch, B & C B Mervis etc. The Effect of Context on the Structure of Categories [J]. In Cognitive Psychology 15, 1976.346 - 78.
  • 9Yule, G. Pragmatics [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 10Colston, H.L.& O' Brien, J.Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better[J].Journal of Pragmatics, 2000(32): 1557-1583.

共引文献37

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部