期刊文献+

谋生技能作为夫妻共同财产的法理分析——兼评《婚姻法》第40条 被引量:1

A Legal Analyses on Whether Living Skill Could be Considered as Community Property——With an argument to the clause of No.40 of Marriage Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 谋生技能能否作为夫妻共同财产予以分割,涉及到物与财产的关系。物权法的调整范围应从有体物扩大到财产利益。谋生技能属于财产利益的范畴,也具有特定性和可直接支配性的特点,应予以分割。鉴于谋生技能与有体物存在差异性,对其分割宜采用一次性补偿的方法。这种一次性补偿与《婚姻法》第40条所规定的家务补偿具有一定的相似性,但该条所附加的限制性条件又使得其适用范围非常有限。文章对此条提出了修正的意见,同时主张扩大物权法的调整范围,为家务补偿制度提供理论基础。 Whether living skill is treated as community property is related to the correlation of res and property. China res law should enlarge the regulation range from tangible res to property interest. Living skill has interest of property, it also has special character and could be dominated directly, so it should be divided as community property. In view of the difference between tangible res and living skill, one who mastered living skill should pay off the compensation once. The division way is similar to the house - work compensation which is regulated by the clause of 40 of Marriage Law, but the strict conditions limit the application of house - work compensation. The article make a suggestions for the improvement of house - work compensation and advocate enlarging the regulation range to form a theoretical base for the house -work compensation .
作者 张素华
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《中州大学学报》 2007年第1期1-4,共4页 Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词 财产 谋生技能 家务补偿 res property living skill house - work compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1彭万林.民法学[M].中国政法大学出版社,1996..
  • 2法国拉鲁斯出版公司.法国拉鲁斯大百科全书:第3卷[C].国外法学译丛·民法.北京:知识出版社,1981:168.
  • 3梅因 沈景一译.古代法[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 4黄晖.法国民法中的财产权概念[N].人民法院报,2001-10-22.
  • 5[德]黑格尔 范扬等译.法哲学原理[M].北京,商务印书馆,1982..

共引文献91

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部