波普尔解决休谟归纳问题了吗?

Has Popper Solved Hume's Question?

波普尔自认为以演绎代替归纳从而“解决”了休谟问题。本文详细分析了波普尔演绎模式的核心,即“猜想”本身的逻辑结构及其潜在的极限,认为猜想的科学发现模式并不具备波普尔所期望的纯逻辑必然性。与此相反,猜想的基础滑向了信仰,从而失去纯逻辑的严格性;其次,如果猜想否弃经验观测的必然地位,则使科学走向神启,如果猜想回归经验观测,则实难脱离休谟的诘难。

In Popper＇s opinion, deduction could replace conclusion so as to solve Hume＇s question. This thesis analyzes the core of Popper＇s deduction mode, that is, the logical structure and potential limit of conjecture. It points out that the scientific discovery mode of conjecture does not possess the pure logical inevitability, which is expected by Popper. On the contrary, the foundation of conjecture shifts to belief, thus losing the strictness of pure logic. Moreover, if conjecture denies the inevitable position of experience, science would head for God. And if conjecture returns to experience, it would actually be hard to get rid of Hume＇s blame.