期刊文献+

从区域研究到文化研究:人文社科学术范式转换 被引量:16

From Area Studies to Cultural Studies:The Paradigmatic Changes in Humanities and Social Sciences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从美国学术界区域研究和文化研究的发展趋势入手,探讨区域研究与冷战及美国政府的关系、区域研究的两种学术范式、区域研究与文化研究的政治分歧、西方的文化研究与中国研究的走向等问题。在此基础上,作者对中国文化研究的理论创新和破除西方至上的新西方主义神话等提出了自己的见解。 This paper,focusing on the trends of development in American area studies and cultural studies,discusses the relationship of area studies with cold war and US government,the two academic paradigms in area studies,the political difference between area studies and cultural studies,and the development of western cultural studies and Chinese studies,based on which,it tries to put forward some ideas on theoretical creation and exorcization of the myth of the new and superior Westernism in Chinese cultural studies.
作者 刘康
出处 《文艺研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期12-20,共9页 Literature & Art Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Cf.Michel Foucault,History of Sexuality:the Will to Knowledge,Vol.Ⅰ,New York:Vintage Books,1990.
  • 2Cf.O'Gearoid Tuathail et al.,The Geopolitics Reader,New York:Routledge,1998.
  • 3Bruce Cumings,“Boundary Dsplacement:Area Studies and International Studies after the Cold War”,Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies,Honolulu,April 11-14.1996.
  • 4Cf.Timothy Glander,Origins of Mass Communications Research during the American Cold War,Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers,2000.
  • 5Cf.Harry Harding,“The Changing Roles of the Academic China-Watcher”,Conference on Trends in China Watching,George Washington University,Oct.8-9,1999,http://www.gwu.edu/-sigur/harding99.htm.
  • 6Cf.Andrew Walder,“The Transformation of Contemporary China Studies,1977-2002”,UCIAS Edited Volume3:The Politics of Knowledge:Area Studies and the Disciplines,UCIAS,Stanford University.

同被引文献129

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部