摘要
占有的法律性质为法益,故而基于占有而生的占有保护请求权的法律性质为物上请求权,而非物权请求权。我国民法应当区分物上请求权与物权请求权。《中华人民共和国物权法》将物上请求权等同于物权请求权,并在物权法总则中专章规定物权请求权,此种用总则中物权请求权的规定统领分则中所有类型的物上请求权的做法易使总则的规定与分则的规定发生法条上的逻辑矛盾。
Legal nature of the claim of possession is the claim of right over things, because the legal nature of possession is legal interest. Civil law of China should distinguish the claim of right of things from the claim of right over things. According to the real right law of China, the claim of right of things is equivalent to the claim of right over things ; moreover, the claim of right of things is provided in general provision of the real right law with special chapter. Thus, contradiction and conflict between articles of law of things occur.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
2007年第3期19-23,共5页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
占有
法益
占有保护请求权
物上请求权
物权请求权
possession legal interest claim of possession claim of right of things claim of right over things