期刊文献+

后现代课程观对高职教师专业发展的启示 被引量:2

Post-modern Curriculum View and Its Inspirations to Professional Development of Higher Vocational Teachers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 后现代课程观强调课程发展必须反映多元论和个人独特性.课程设计者和实施者要理解每一个情境的多元性与复杂性。其对高职教师专业发展的启示在于.高职教师应积极培养丰富且多样的能力,尝试改变教学上的互动方式,将角色定位为协助学生进行知识建构,并在课程实践中反思、在反思中实践,不断促进自身专业发展。 The post-modern curriculum view emphasizes curriculum development must reflect the pluralism and uniqueness of individual, and course designers and implementers should understand diversity and complexity of each situation. Its inspirations to professional development of higher vocational teachers are that teachers should actively cultivate rich and diverse abilities, try to change the interactive modes in teaching, assist students to construct knowledge, make reflection in course practice and practice in reflection to constantly promote their professional development.
作者 阮彩霞
出处 《职业技术教育》 2007年第7期48-49,共2页 Vocational and Technical Education
关键词 后现代课程观 教师专业发展 高等职业教育 post-modern curriculum view teachers' professional development higher vocational education
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[美]Best.S,Kellner.K.D著,张志斌译.后现代理论:批判性的质疑[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2001.
  • 2[美]小威廉姆 E 多尔.后现代课程观[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000..
  • 3汪霞.概念重建课程研究的后现代本质与评价[J].比较教育研究,2005,26(10):68-72. 被引量:12
  • 4徐国庆.课程涵义与课程思维[J].中国职业技术教育,2006,22(7):18-20. 被引量:59
  • 5Ornstein, A. C.(1991).Philosophy as a Basis for Curriculum Decisions.The High School Journal, 74,102-109.
  • 6Pinar, W.F.,Reynold s,W.M.,Slattery,P.&Taubman, P. M. (1995).Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses.New York,NY:Peter Lang.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Giroux, H., Penna,A., & Pinar, W. (Eds.). Curriculum and Instruction. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1981.99-102.
  • 2See Slattery, P. Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era [ M ]. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1995. 263-264; Wraga, William G. Toward a Curriculum Theory for the New Century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1996. (4): 463-474.
  • 3Slattery, P. Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1995. 55-62.
  • 4Thomas, P. T. & Schubert, W. H. Recent Curriculum Theory. Educational Theory, 1997.(2): 267.
  • 5Glanz, J. & Behar-Horenstein, L. S. Paradigm Debates in Curriculum and Supervision: Modern and Postmodern Perspectives. Westport CT: Bergin & Garvey, 2000. 17-18.
  • 6Pinar, W. Curriculum Studies: The Reconceptualization.Troy, NY: Educator's International Press, Inc., 2000. 359.
  • 7Eagleton, T. Literary Theory: An Introduction. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1981. 133.
  • 8Pinar, W.F. Autobiography, Politics and Sexuality. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.,1994. 104.
  • 9Flinders, D. J. & Thornton, S. J. The Curriculum Stud ies Reader. New York and London: Routledge, 1997. 137.
  • 10Schubert, W. Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm, and Possibility. New York: Macmillan, 1986. 33.

共引文献93

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部