文史殊途——从梁启超、陈寅恪的陶渊明论谈起

Reaching the Same Object by Different Routes:From Liang qichao and Chen yinque’s Discourses on Tao yuanming

本文尝试通过对梁启超与陈寅恪的有关陶渊明论述的梳理,说明在现代的文学史研究中,有些研究结论的差异乃至于学术争鸣,实际上是由于研究者的关怀所在以及他们接受的学术训练不同造成的。梁启超的由文入史和陈寅恪的由史入文分别代表了两种不同的学术路径。

This article,through reviewing and combing the researches on Tao Yuanming made respectively by Liang Qichao and Chen Yinque, intends to explain that,in modern literature history study,different concerns or interests and academic trainings the scholars have can really lead to the academic controversies or divergences.Liang sought his breakthrough in the research of history from literary background, while Chen was just the other way around.They show us two different research methods.