期刊文献+

试析对无限防卫权的质疑

Analysis on Query about Unlimited Justifiable Defense Right
下载PDF
导出
摘要 剖析并驳斥了对无限防卫权的种种质疑,认为湖北省交警总队发布的有关群众打死车匪路霸不负刑事责任,公安机关还给予奖励的通告,合乎刑法典关于无限防卫权的规定,是一种合法的行政奖励行为。对无限防卫权的质疑既没有合理的依据也没有现实的必要,反而容易造成思想上的混乱,令人无所适从。因此,从正面肯定对无限防卫权的行政奖励并推而广之是十分必要的。 All sorts of queries to unlimited justifiable defense are analyzed and refuted. It is considered that the t issued by the general bureau of traffic police Hubei Branch conforms with the provision on unlimited justifiable defense right of criminal law, and it is a kind of legal administration reward, which declares that a person who killed the spoliators robbing on roads should not been took into court for an criminal offence, and could be rewarded by the public security organ. There is not a rational basis, nor is a realistic necessity to query the unlimited justifiable defense right, it is apt to cause the confusion on the thought instead, make people at a loss as to what to do. Therefore, positively affirming and popularizing the administration reward of unlimited justifiable defense right is very essential.
作者 陈朝晖
机构地区 渤海大学商学院
出处 《沈阳大学学报》 CAS 2007年第3期59-62,共4页
关键词 车匪路霸 正当防卫 无限防卫权 行政奖励 spoliators robbing on roads self-defense unlimited justifiable defense right administrative rewards
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]陈枫.谁有权说"打死有奖"[N].中国青年报,2003-06-04.
  • 2[2]汪永乐.质疑"打死歹徒有奖"[N].南方周末,2001-08-09.
  • 3[2]大琢仁.刑法概说:总论[M].冯军译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
  • 4[2]邓小平文选:第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
  • 5甘艳.无限防卫的不合理性探析[J].湖南行政学院学报,2004(5):63-64. 被引量:1
  • 6章深.打死车匪路霸有奖?[J].南风窗,2003(07S):78-78. 被引量:1

二级参考文献2

共引文献222

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部