期刊文献+

柔道经济学下规模差异电厂关于报价策略的博弈

Bidding Strategy between Different Scale Power Plants under Judo Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着2002年以来电力投资热潮的不断加剧,我国出现了潜在电力投资过度的现象,加剧了发电侧发电厂商的竞争,规模差异的发电厂商之间的竞争尤为激烈。中小型发电厂商在与大型发电厂商的竞争中一直处于劣势。本文从中小电厂的角度出发,通过对Salop博弈模型的运用,得出在PAB竞价机制下,中小电厂面对大型电厂的竞争压力,可以获得生存的空间。 With more and more investment in power plant from 2002, the phenomenon of excess investment appears in our country, thus strengthen the competition among power plant in electricity--generation--side, specially among the different scale power plants. The small and medium-- size power plants is in inferior position in rival with big power plants. This article base on the position of the small and medium--size power plants. Using Salop Game Theory model to analyse the bidding strategy of the small and medium--size power plants under PAB Bidding system, we get the result that the small and medium--size power plants could make its own profits in the condition of limiting it output and lowing its price.
作者 贾德铮 徐飞
出处 《科技和产业》 2007年第6期46-49,共4页 Science Technology and Industry
关键词 柔道经济学 电厂 市场进入 judo economics power plant market entry
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献40

  • 1杨莉,包松,吕洪炳,冯冬涵,甘德强.电力市场购买方风险与发电商必发容量[J].电力系统自动化,2004,28(21):1-5. 被引量:9
  • 2R W Ferrero, S M Shahidehpour, V C Ramesh. 《 Transaction analysis in deregulated power systems using game theory》 [J], 《IEEE Transaction on Power Systems》, 1997, 3.
  • 3R W Ferrero, J F Rivera, S M Shahidehpour: 《Application of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools》 [J], 《IEEE Transaction on Power Systems》,1998, 1.
  • 4Jong Bae Park, et al. 《A continuous strategy game for power transactions analysis in competitive electricity markets》 [J], 《IEEE Transaction on Power Systems》, 2001, 4.
  • 5Jukka Ruusunen, et al. 《Dynamic cooperative electricity exchange in a power pool》 [J], 《IEEE Transaction System Man and Cybernetics 》, 1991, 4.
  • 6Benjamin F.Hobbs. 《Using game theory to analyze electric transmission pricing policies in the United states》 [J], 《European Journal of Operational Research56》 , P759-P765o.
  • 7X Bai, S M Shahidehpour, E Yu. 《Transmission analysis by nash game method》 [J], 《IEEE Transaction on Power Systems》, 1997, 3.
  • 8V Krishna, V C Ramesh. 《Intelligent agents for negotiations in market games, Part Ⅰ and Part Ⅱ 》 [C], Columbus, 1997.
  • 9Exelby M J, Lucas N J D. 《Competition in the UK market for electricity generating capacity-a game theory analysis》 [J], 《Energy Policy》, 1993, 4.
  • 10Zhongfu Tan, Han Yong, Calculation Methods for Electric Energy Price of Power Plants [ C]. Proceedings of 2001' International Conference on Management Science &Engineering. ISSN7 - 5603 - 1654 - 9.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部