期刊文献+

抗性淀粉、脂肪和蛋白质对淀粉体外消化速度的影响 被引量:9

Effects of resistant starch, fat and protein on rates of starch hydrolysis in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨抗性淀粉、脂肪和蛋白质对淀粉体外消化速度的影响。方法以抗性淀粉、脂肪和蛋白质为因素进行三因素三水平正交实验,参照Englyst建立的体外消化试验方法,测定240min内的10个时间点的还原糖释放率,绘制还原糖曲线图,比较各水平组合下还原糖释放率及释放指数的差异。结果正交实验各组合的还原糖水解速率有差异,方差分析显示随着抗性淀粉含量、脂肪含量的增加,各时间段的还原糖释放率显著下降(P<0.05),但蛋白质的影响不具有显著性。对2h还原糖释放指数影响最大的因素是脂肪,其次是抗性淀粉和蛋白质,使还原糖释放指数最高的组合是抗性淀粉占比例为0,脂肪占比例为0,蛋白质所占比例为20%。结论淀粉中添加抗性淀粉和脂肪可以显著降低淀粉的体外消化速度,蛋白质无此作用。 To evaluate the effects of resistant starch, fat, and protein on rates of starch hydrolysis in vitro.Methods By an orthogonal experimental design, starch hydrolysis rates of nine test foods composed of different levels of restsistant starch, fat, protein were measured according to Englyst's method. The starch hydrolysis curve were obtained and the release index of reduce sugar were analyzed by variance analysis. Results The release index of reduce sugar decreased significantly with the amount of fat and RS increased( P 〈 0.05 ). The first affecting factor on the release index of reduce sugar within 2 hours was fat, the second one was RS, and the last one was protein The optimum of the release index of reduce sugar within 2 hours was as follow: 0% RS, 0% fat and 20% protein. Conclusion The addition of RS and fat could significantly decrease the hydrolysis rates of starch.
出处 《卫生研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期308-310,共3页 Journal of Hygiene Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.30671749)
关键词 抗性淀粉 脂肪 蛋白质 体外消化速度 resistant starch fat protein rates of starch hydrolysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1ENGLYST H N,VEENSTRA J,HUDSON G J,et al.Measurement of rapidly available glucose(RAG)in plant foods:a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response[J].Br J Nutr,1996,75:327-337.
  • 2ENGLYST H N,KINGMAN S M,CUMMINGS J H,Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions[J].Eur J Clin Nutr,1992,2(suppl):S33-50.
  • 3ENGLYST K N,ENGLYST H N,HUDSON G J,et al.Rapidly avaifable glucose in foods:an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response[J].Am J Clin Nutr,1999,69:448-454.
  • 4NATALI A,GASTALDELLI A,CAMASTRA S,et al.Dose-response characteristics of insulin action on glucose metabolism:a non-steady-state approach[J].Am J Physiol,2000,278:794-801.
  • 5LOON L J,SARIS W H,VERHAGEN H,et al.Plasma insalin responses after ingestion of different amino acid or protein mixtures with carbohydrate[J].Am J Clin Nutr,2000,72:96-105.
  • 6SIMPSON R W,McDONALD J,WAHLQVIST M L,et al.Macronutrients have different metubolic effects in nondiabetics and diabetics[J].Am J Clin Nutr,1985,42:449-453.
  • 7GANNON M.ERCAN N,WESTPHAL S,et al.Effect of added fat on plasma glcose and insulin response to ingested potato in individuals with NIDDM[J].Diabetes Care,1993,16:874-870.
  • 8COULSTON A M,HOLLENBECK C B,LIU G C,et al.Effect of source of dietary carbohydrate on plasma glucose,insulin,and gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses to test meals in subjects with noninsulindependent diabetes mellitus[J].Am J Clin Nutr,1984,40:965-970.
  • 9COULSTON A M,HOLLENBECK C B,SWISLOCKI A L,et al.Effect of source of dietary carbohydrate on plasma glucose and insulin responses to mixed meals in subjects with NIDDM[J].Diabetes Care,1987,10:395-400.
  • 10HOLLENBECK C B,COULSTON A M,REAVEN G M.Comparison of plasma glucose and insulin responses to mixed meals of high-,intermediate-,and low-glycemic potential[J].Diabetes Care,1988,11:323-329.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Botnry FRJ, Bizais Y, Varammes SBD, et al. α-amylase (EC. 3.2.1.1) susceptibility rather than viscosity of gastric emptying rate controls plasma response to starch in healthy humans [J]. Br J Nutr, 1990, 63:207-220.
  • 2Achour A, Flourie B, Franchisseur C, et al.Metabolic effects of digestible and partially indigestible starch: a study in the absorptive and postabsorptive methods in healthy humans [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1997,66:1151-1159.
  • 3Frost G, Leeds AA, Dore C J, et al. Glycemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353(9158):1045-1048.
  • 4Truswell AS. Glycaemic index of foods [J]. Eur J Clin Nutr, 1992,46:S91-S101.
  • 5Jenkins DJA, Wolever TWS, Tayler RH, et al.Glycemic index of foods : a physical basis for carbohy-drate exchange [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1981, 34:362-366.
  • 6Champ MM, Molis C, Flourie B, et al. Small-intestinal digestion of partially resistant corn starch in healthy subjects [J]. Am J Clin ]Nutr, 1998, 68:705-710.
  • 7Jankins DJ, Vuksan V, Kendall CW, et al. Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk,short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and glycemic index [J]. Am J Coll Nutr, 1998, 17:609-616.
  • 8Raben A, Tagliabue A, Christensen N J, et al. Resistant starch: the effect on postprandial glycemia,hormonal response, and satiety [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1994, 60:544-551.
  • 9Pagliassotti MJ, Prach PA. Quantity of sucrose alters the tissue pattern and time course of insulin resistance in young rats [J]. Am J Physiol, 1995, 269(Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 38) :R641-R646.
  • 10Higgins JA, Brand Miller JC, Denyer GS. Development of insulin resistance in the rat is dependent on the rate of glucose absorption from the diet [J]. J Nutr, 1996, 126:596-602.

共引文献81

同被引文献140

引证文献9

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部