期刊文献+

慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系共性模块的考评 被引量:34

Development of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for patients with chronic disease:evaluation of the general module
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考评慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系共性模块(QLICD-GM)。方法通过607例慢性病患者进行的生命质量测定对量表进行评价。所用到的统计学方法有相关分析、配对t检验、方差分析、因子分析。结果各领域及总量表的重测信度均在0.75以上,分半信度为0.89,躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能领域的内部一致性信度α值分别为0.78,0.88,0.37;各条目与其领域的相关系数较大而与其他领域的相关系数相对较小;除社会功能领域外,其余领域和总量表均发现治疗前后得分变化有统计学意义,且标准化反应均数SRM分别为0.68,0.58和0.70。结论QLICD-GM具有较好的信度、反应度,一定的效度和鉴别力,可用于慢性病患者生命质量测定。 Objective To evaluate the general module for the system of quality of life instrument for patients with chronic disease (QLICD-GM). Methods QLICD-GM was evaluated by QOL data measured from 607 patients of chronic diseases. The statistic methods include paired t -test, analysis of correlation, analysis of variance and factor analysis. Results The test-retest reliability for all domains and the overall questionnaire are above 0.75, split-half reliability is 0.89, internal consistency α for three domains of physical, psychological and social were 0.78, 0.88 and 0.38 respectively. Each correlation coefficient between single item and it's domain is higher than that of between single item and other domains. There are statistically significant changes for all domains and the overall questionnaire except the social function after treatment, with standardized response mean SRM being 0.68, 0.58 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion The QLICD-GM can be used to measure QOL for patients of chronic diseases with better reliability, responsiveness and acceptable validity and discriminability.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2007年第6期559-561,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(30360092)
关键词 慢性病 生命质量 信度 效度 反应度 Chronic disease Quality of life Reliability Validity Responsiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Johnson JR, Temple R. Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rep, 1985,69: 1155- 1157.
  • 2Aronson NK. Quality of Life research in oncology: Past achievements and future priorities. Cancer,1991,67:839-843.
  • 3Cella D, Nowinski CJ . Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,2002.10-17.
  • 4万崇华.生命质量研究中一些重要问题的商讨(二)[J].中国行为医学科学,1999,8(2):155-157. 被引量:27
  • 5万崇华,李晓梅,赵旭东,杨玉萍,潘家华,周曾芬,杨铮,张晓磬,杨瑞雪,高丽.慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(12):1130-1131. 被引量:86
  • 6万崇华,高丽,李晓梅,杨玉萍,潘家华,周曾芬,杨铮,张晓磬.慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系共性模块研制方法(一)——条目筛选及共性模块的形成[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):723-726. 被引量:71
  • 7万崇华,方积乾,史明丽,陈丽影,张玉祖.MOS SF-36量表用于药物成瘾者生命质量测定的对比研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1998,7(4):260-261. 被引量:121
  • 8Thumboo J, Fong KY, Chan SP, et al. The equivalence of English and Chinese SF-36 versions in bilingual Singapore Chinese. Quality of Life Research,2002,11:495-503.
  • 9Hofer S, Benzer W, Schubler G, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: Validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires. Quality of Life Research ,2003,12 : 199-212.
  • 10Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, et al. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research,2003,12:349-363.

二级参考文献25

  • 1何翔玲.中西医结合治疗糖尿病提高生活质量的临床观察[J].新中医,1995,27(1):29-30. 被引量:13
  • 2冯正仪,戴宝珍,顾沛,吕探云,钱晓路,王蓓玲,王君俏,卢惠娟,周以梅,胡雁,谢立亚.糖尿病患者生活质量的评估研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1995,4(3):137-139. 被引量:55
  • 3万崇华,方积乾.生存质量资料的统计分析方法[J].中华预防医学杂志,1996,30(3):172-174. 被引量:41
  • 4陈和年 胡孟璇 等.生命质量测量的代理者研究[J].中华防治医学杂志,1996,30(5):272-272.
  • 5陈和年,中华预防医学杂志,1996年,30卷,5期,272页
  • 6Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, et al. Quality of life measurement: will we ever besatisfied? J Clin Epidemiol,2000, 53(1): 19-23.
  • 7Daltroy LH, Larson MG, Eaton HM, et al. Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: the influence of response shift and other factors. Soc Sci Med, 1999,48(11): 1549-1561.
  • 8Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS. Quality of life:a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med, 1997, 45(2): 221-230.
  • 9Dolan P. The effect of experience of illness on health state valuations. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996,49(5): 551-564.
  • 10Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol, 1993,11(3):570-579.

共引文献264

同被引文献229

引证文献34

二级引证文献260

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部