期刊文献+

2005年度上半年PETS三级考试作文评分效度研究

Study on the Scoring Validity of Essays in PETS 3 in 1995
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对2005年3月份PETS三级考试的作文语料进行了大规模的抽样调查,运用定性和定量相结合的方法研究了PETS三级考试作文评分效度.结果显示:虽然2005年3月份PETS三级考试的作文原始分与多人再评的参照分数相关,但原始分与多人再评的平均分之间存在统计上的显著性差异;该作文考试的题目说明没有详细、清晰地说明写作程序及评分方法,导致部分考生不能准确把握写作内容. The compositions in PETS 3 in March, 2005 were sampled, and the scoring validity in terms of raters for compositions in PETS 3 was tested with quantitative and qualitative methods. The results show that: although original ratings and standardized ratings in 2005 are correlated, their average scores are significantly different; the writing specification in this test could not show the writing procedures and scoring methods accurately, which results in that some examinees could not write accurately.
出处 《温州大学学报(自然科学版)》 2007年第3期53-57,共5页 Journal of Wenzhou University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 鲁东大学2006年研究生创新基金(Ycx0625)
关键词 作丈 评分效度 PETS三级考试 Composition Scoring validity PETS 3
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1[1]Bachman L F.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990.14-15.
  • 2[2]Alderson J C.Dis-sporting life:response to Alistair Pollitt's paper[A].In:Alderson J C,North B.Language Testing in the 1990s[C].London:Macmillan,1991.60-67.
  • 3[3]Weir C J.Language Testing and Validation:An Evidence-based Approach[M].Basingstoke,Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.47-48.
  • 4[4]Weigle S C.Assessing Writing[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.108-139.
  • 5[5]Jacobs H L,Zingkgraf S A,Wormuth D R,et al.Testing ESL Composition:A Practical Approach[M].Rowley,MA:Newbury House Publishers,Inc,1981.24-28.
  • 6[6]Hamp L L.Raters respond to rhetoric in writing[A].In:Dechert H W,Paupach M.Interlingual Processes[C].Tubingen:Gunnter Narr Verlag,1989.229-244.
  • 7[7]Hamilton J,Reddel S,Spratt M.Teacher's perceptions of on-line rater training and monitoring[J].System,2001,(29):505-520.
  • 8[8]Vaughan C.Holistic assessment:what goes on in the raters' minds?[A].In:Hamp L L.Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts[C].Norwood NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation,1991.111-125.
  • 9[9]Engelhard J G.Evaluating rater accuracy in performance assessments[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,1996,(33):56-70.
  • 10蔡基刚.大学英语四、六级写作要求和评分标准对中国学生写作的影响[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(5):49-53. 被引量:134

二级参考文献22

共引文献249

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部