期刊文献+

云南双核丝核菌不同融合群菌株的遗传分化研究 被引量:1

CENETIC DIVERSITY OF DIFFERENT ANASTOMOSIS GROUP OF BINUCLEAT RHIZOCTIOIA IN YUNNAN PROVINCE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用12个随机引物对23个双核丝核菌菌株进行DNA指纹分析,结果表明,12个引物共获得210条多态性DNA谱带,多态性检测率为100%。利用UPGMA法构建的分子系统树分析发现,以遗传距离0.86为阈值,可以将供试的23个菌株分为13个RAPD组,三个测试菌株:Bch-61、SM-18、RY-86的融合群归属问题有待于进一步确定。上述结果说明供试的双核丝核菌菌株间存在丰富的遗传多样性。 Twelve RAPD primers were used to assess the genetic variation of 23 isolates of binucleate Rhizoctonia from different localities of Yunnan Province. A total of 210 polymorphic bands were amplified with and no common bands were found among tested isolates. The results showed that the rate of polymorphism of the isolates was 100 %. The dendrogram constructed by Unweighted Pair Group Method using Arithmetic Average (UPGMA) suggested that 23 isolates could be divided into 13 RAPD groups with a genetic distance of O. 86, according to RAPD data. However, 3 isolates, Bch-61, SM- 18, and RY- 16, warrant further identification.
出处 《山东农业大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期203-206,共4页 Journal of Shandong Agricultural University:Natural Science Edition
关键词 双核丝核菌 融合群 遗传分化 Binucleat Rhizoctonia Anastomosis group Genetic variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张敦华 陈延熙.双核丝核菌的菌丝融合分类.植物病理学报,1986,16(3):139-144.
  • 2于金凤,张修国,李红美,张天宇.立枯丝核菌第一融合群的遗传分化[J].菌物系统,2003,22(1):69-73. 被引量:12
  • 3Burpee LL,Sanders P L,Cole H,et al.Anastomosis groups among isolates of ceratobasidium cornigerum and related fungi[J].Mycologia,1980,72:689 -701.
  • 4Burpee L.L.Rhizoctonia cerealis causes yellow patchof turfgrass[J].Plant Disease,1980,64:1114 -1116
  • 5Duncan S,Barton JE,O'-Brien PA.Analysis of variation in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay[J].Mycological Research,1993,97:1075-1082.
  • 6Ogoshi A,Studies on the Taxonomy of the Genus Rhizoctonia[J].Annual phytopatholoy Socity Japan,1984,50:307 -309.
  • 7Ogoshi A,Oniki M,Sakai R,et al.Anastomosis Grouping among isolates of Binucleate Rhizoctonia[J].Trans.Mycol.Soc.Jpn.1979,20:33 -39.
  • 8Ogoshi.A.Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani kuhn[J].Ann.Rev.Phytopathol,1987,25:125-143.
  • 9Toda T,Hyakumachi M,Arora DK.Genetic relatedness among and within different Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis groups as assessed by RAPD,ERIC and REP-PCR[J].Microbiological Research,1999,154:247-258.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[7]Parmeter, J R Jr, Sherwood, R T, et al., 1969. Anastomosis grouping among isolates of Thanatephorus Cucumwris Phytopathology, 59: 1270~1278
  • 2[8]Schultz H, 1937. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur ?kologie,Morphologie,und Systematic des "Vermehrungpilzes". Arb Biol Reichanst Land Forstwirtsch Berlin-Dahlem, 22: 1~41
  • 3[9]Willams J G K, Kubelic A R, Livak K J, et al., 1990. DNA Polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res, 18: 6531~6535
  • 4[1]Anderson N A, 1982. The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Ann Rev Phytopathol, 20: 329~347
  • 5[2]Ducan S, Barton J E, O'brien P A, 1993. Analysis of variation in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani byrandom amplified polymorphic DNA assay Mycol Res, 97: 1075~1082
  • 6[3]Liu ZL, Sinclair JB, 1993. Molecular differentiation of intraspecific groups within anastomosis group 1 of Rhizoctonia solani. Can J Plant Pathol, 15: 272~280
  • 7[4]Lilja A, Hietala A M, Karjalainen R, 1996. Idetification of a uninucleate Rhizoctonia sp. By pathogenicity,hyphal anastomosis and RAPD analysis. Plant Pathology, 45: 997~1006
  • 8[5]Ogoshi A, 1975. Studies on the anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn and on their perfect stages. Bull Nat. Inst Agric, Ser C 30: 1~63
  • 9[6]Ogoshi A, 1987. Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani kuhn Ann Rev Phytopathol, 25: 125~143

共引文献11

同被引文献20

  • 1Piper C V,Coe H S.Rhizoctonia in lawn and pastures[J].Phytopathology,1919,78:15-16.
  • 2Toda T,Mushika T,Hyakumachi M.Development of specific PCR primers for the detection of Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2LP from the leaf sheaths exhibiting large-patch symptom on zoysia grass[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,2004,232:67-74.
  • 3Ogoshi A.Ecology and Pathogenicity of Anastomsis and Intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn[J].Annual Review of Phytopathology,1987,25:125-143.
  • 4Wang T C,Hsich Y.Rhizoctonia spp.causing turfgrass disease and their anastomosis groups in Taiwan[J].Plant Pathology Bulletin,1993,2:111-118.
  • 5Zhang M,Dernoeden P H.Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis groupsand other fungi associated with brown patch-affected turfgrasses in Maryland,USA[J].International Turfgrass Society Research Journal,1997,8:959-969.
  • 6Martin S B,Jeffers S N,Rogers A.Isolation frequency and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia species from tall fescue crown and leaf tissues from two locations in South Carolina[J].International Turfgrass Society Research Journal,2001,9:689-694.
  • 7Hyakumachi M,Mushika T,Ogiso Y,et al.Characterization of a new cultural type(LP)of Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2isolated from warm-season turfgrasses,and its genetic differentiation from other cultural types[J].Plant Pathology,1998,47[1] :1-9.
  • 8Toda T,Hyakumachi M,Suga H,et al.Differentiation of Rhizoctonia AG-D Isolates from Turfgrass into Subgroups I and II Based on rDNA and RAPD Analyses[J].European Journal of Plant Pathology,1999,105[9] :835-846.
  • 9Godoy-Lutz G,Kuninaga S,Steadman J R,et al.Phylogenetic analysis of Rhizoctonia solani subgroups associated with web blight symptoms on common bean based on ITS-5.8S rDNA[J].Journal of General Plant Pathology,2008,74:32-40.
  • 10Sharon M,Kuninaga S,Hyakumachi M,et al.The advancing identification and classification of Rhizoctonia spp.using molecular and biotechnological methods compared with the classical anastomosis grouping[J].Mycoscience,2006,47:299-316.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部