期刊文献+

商业方法专利的扩展——交易性分析与技术科学的融合 被引量:2

The Expansion of the Business Methods Patent——The Introjections of Trade Analysis and Technical Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商业方法的可专利性对大公司和小公司都有重大的影响,特别是中型公司。具有有效的知识产权诉讼预算的大公司有胆量去威吓小公司,这使得它们不敢使用商业方法进行竞争,并且这将增强大公司提出商业方法专利使用费的机会。处于高科技外缘的小公司没有为商业方法资产管理和侵权风险管理的费用和意外做好准备。州街道案已放松了一些条件,其告诉人们大多数商业公司将"生活在一个有利的时代"。 The patentability of the business method may have great influence on both large and small company, especially on the medium-sized company. The large companies with sufficient budget for litigation dare to bulldoze the small companies to make them quit using the business methods to compete, Which gives the large companies more opportunities to bring forward the royalty of business methods. The small companies which are on the edge of the high-tech are still not ready to the cost to manage the assets of business methods,and they are not ready to manage the unexpected tort risk. The State Street case has loosened some qualification, which tells us that most of the business companies will "live in a beneficial era".
出处 《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》 2007年第4期146-161,共16页 Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 商业方法 专利 扩展 business methods patent expansion
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1.
  • 2F. 3d1526(Fed.Cir.19940) .
  • 3F.3d 1368(Fed.Cir.1998) .
  • 4.Del Mar Avionics v.Quinton Inv.Co[].Fd.1987
  • 5http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/hearings/software/analysis/computer.ht-ml。 .
  • 6.
  • 7Lawrence Lessing.Online Patents:Leave Them Pending[].WALLSTJ.2000
  • 8.Unites States v.Terminal Railroad Ass’n[].US.1912
  • 9.Patterson v.Kentucky[].US.1878
  • 10.Amazon.com v.Barnesandnoble.com,Inc[].FSuppd (WDWash).

同被引文献22

  • 1谭浩,王娟.花旗银行抢注专利 中资银行应该警醒[J].金融博览,2002(12):16-16. 被引量:1
  • 2刘旗辉等.商界-中国最佳商业模式经典[J].商界评论,2007,:173-173.
  • 3李扬主编.知识产权的合理性、危机及未来模式.法律出版社.2005年版.第20页.
  • 4FINE G S. To Issue or Not to Issue: Analysis of the Business Method Patent Controversy on the Internet [ J]. Boston College Law Review, 2001 (42) :1195.
  • 537 CFR Part 42, Changes to Implement Inter Partes Re- view Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Pa- tents, Final Rule [ EB/OL]. [ 2014-04-02 ]. http:// www. uspto, gov/aia _ implementation/fr _ specific _ trial, pdf.
  • 6Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010).
  • 7In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008) ,Mayer 法官异议.
  • 8Cybersource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc. , 654 F. 3d 1366 (2011).
  • 9Bancorp Services, L. L. C. v Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (U. S. ) ,687 F. 3d 1266 (2012).
  • 10Research Corp. Tech. , Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2010-1037 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部