期刊文献+

螺旋CT多平面重建对临床不典型阑尾炎的诊断价值 被引量:6

Appendicitis with Atypical Clinical Features:Spiral CT Assessment with Multiplanar Reconstruction Versus Transaxial CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨螺旋CT多平面重建(MPR)对无典型临床表现阑尾炎的诊断价值。方法:搜集临床首次诊断未考虑为阑尾炎,手术和病理证实为阑尾炎者19例,回顾性分析比较螺旋CT轴扫和多平面重建(MPR)两种方法的诊断符合率。结果:8例表现为阑尾增粗、壁增厚并有明显强化,其中4例阑尾内见结石;盲肠和(或)周围炎10例;右下腹局限性脓肿5例,其中2例伴斑点钙化。采用螺旋CT轴扫法误诊为回盲部及升结肠肿瘤2例,盆腔炎1例,误诊率15.8%,诊断符合率84.2%。采用螺旋CT多平面重建法误诊为回盲部及升结肠肿瘤1例,误诊率5.3%,诊断符合率94.7%。结论:症状和体征不典型的阑尾炎临床诊断困难,易误诊,螺旋CTMPR方法简单,可从不同角度观察病变部位及其周围情况,有利于鉴别诊断,提高诊断符合率,具有较高的临床价值。 Objective:To compare the accuracy of spiral CT with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and with transaxial scanning in diagnosis of appendicitis with atypical clinical features, Methods: The accuracy of spiral CT with MPR and with nansaxial scanning of 19 cases of surgically and pathologically confirmed appendicitis, which were not initially considered at clinical presentation were retrospectively compared. Results: With transaxial scanning 2 cases were misdiagnosed as tumor of ileocecum and ascending colon,and another case was misdiagnosed as pelvic inflammatory disease. The false negative rate was 15.8% ,and the true positive rate was 84.2%0. With MPR,1 case was misdiagnosed as tumor of ileocecum and ascending colon. The false negative rate was 5.3 % ,and the true positive rate was 94.7 %. Conclusion:Spiral CT with MPR is of higher sensitivity than that with transaxial scanning alone in diagnosis of appendicitis with atypical clinical features and can decrease its false negative rate.
出处 《放射学实践》 2007年第6期584-586,共3页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 阑尾炎 体层摄影术 X线计算机 多平面重建 Appendicitis Tomography,X-ray computed Muhiplanar reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Birnbaum BA,Jeffrey RB Jr. CT and Sonographic Evaluation of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Abdominal Pain[J]. AJR, 1998,170 (2) :361-371.
  • 2Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. et al. Helical CT Technique for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Prospective Evaluation of a Focused Appendix CT Examination[J ]. Radiology, 1997,202(1) : 139-144.
  • 3Lane MJ,Katz DS, Ross BA, et al. Unenhanced Helical CT for Suspected Acute Appendieitis[J]. AJR, 1997. 168(2):105-409.
  • 4Curtin KR,Fitzgerald SW,Nemcek AA Jr,et al. CT Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis:Imaging Fingings[J]. AJR. 199,5, 164(4): 905-909.
  • 5Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA,et al. Helical CT Combined with Contrast Material Administered Only Though the Colon for Imaging of Suspected Appendicitis [J]. AJR, 1997. 169 (5): 1275- 1280.
  • 6Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J, et al. Diagnosis of Acutpe Appendicitis: Comparison of 5 and 10mm CT Sections in the Some Patient[J]. Radiology,2000,216(1) :172-177.

同被引文献52

  • 1王康,赵泽华,王之,张国桢,王伟忠,徐嵩森,张淼,刘文瑾,奉典旭.应用多层螺旋CT多方位重建技术诊断急性阑尾炎的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):177-180. 被引量:127
  • 2唐肇普,白人驹.穿孔性与非穿孔性阑尾炎的CT鉴别诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(2):135-138. 被引量:80
  • 3顾建华,孙大林.阑尾炎的CT诊断[J].放射学实践,2006,21(6):588-589. 被引量:8
  • 4Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, et al. Suspected acute appendici- tis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiolo gy, 1999,213(2):341-346.
  • 5Raptopoulos V, Katsou G, Rosen MP, et al. Acute appendicitis: effect of increased use of CT on selecting patients earlier. Radiol- ogy, 2003,226(2) :521 526.
  • 6石美鑫.实用外科学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:921-929.
  • 7Brinbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radi- ology, 2002,215 (2) : 337-348.
  • 8Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC. Differentiation of perfora- ted from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology, 2003,227 (1) :46-51.
  • 9Rexroad JT. The CT arrowhead sign. Radiology, 2003,227(1): 44-45.
  • 10Jeffrey RB, Birnbaum BA. CT and sonographic evaluation of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain[J]. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology,, 1998, 170(2): 361-371.

引证文献6

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部