期刊文献+

低mAs-CT低分辨率水模图像质量的实验研究 被引量:2

Experimental Study of Effect of Low Tube Current-Time Product Technique on Image Quality at CT with Low-contrast detection modulus Phantom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨CT检查中低管电流-时间乘积技术低分辨率水模图像质量。方法:设置多种管电流-时间乘积,5和10mm层厚,多种重建算法,对Catphan500模型进行CT扫描,记录CT值,SD值,并计算CNR值。同时运用统计学方法和Excel表格对获得的数据进行统计分析。结果:管电流-时间乘积、射线剂量、层厚和图像质量成正比关系,不同的重建算法对图像质量会产生不同的影响。结论:低管电流-时间乘积能够降低射线剂量,但是剂量减少会增加图像噪声,影响图像质量,增加层厚和使用soft重建算法可以达到降低图像噪声的目的。 Objective:To investigate the effect of low tube current-time product technique on image quality at computed tomography (CT) with Low-contrast detection modulus Phantom. Methods:The parameters milliampere seconds,section thickness and reconstruction algorithm were varied for the scanning with a phantom,Catphan 500. Then the data CT numbers,SD values and the calculated CNR values measured from the images with the phantom were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA, the two-tailed paired t test,Dunnett-t test,nonparametric test,and EXCEL table. Results: Imag quality was direct proportion to the tube current-time product, radiation dose and section thickness, but reconstruction algorithm effected the image quality was diverse. Conclusion: Reduced tube current-time product decreased the radiation dose,but the image quality was degression simultaneously. By using reconstruction algorithm, soft, and increasing section thickness, the image quality was improved.
出处 《放射学实践》 2007年第6期610-612,共3页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 管电流-时间乘积 体层摄影术 X线计算机 图像处理 Tube current-time product Tomography,X-ray computed Image processing Phantom
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of Cancer from Diagnoistic X-rays:Estimates for the UK and 14 other Countries[J]. Lancet,2004,363(31) :345-351.
  • 2张照喜,陈建生,陈军,安连峰,杜东屏,徐宁,葛鸿惠,刘玉林,付荣,陈宪.多层面螺旋CT曝光参数的优化[J].临床放射学杂志,2003,22(3):231-234. 被引量:10
  • 3Payne JT. CT Radiation dose and Image Quality[J]. Radiol Clin N Am,2005,43(6) :953-962.
  • 4Kalender W A,崔世民,王怡,等.计算机体层成像[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.132—133.
  • 5Gupta AK, Nelson RC,Johson GA, et al. Optimization of Eight-element Multi-detector Row Helical CT Technology for Evaluation of Abdomen[J]. Radiology,2003,227(3) :739-745.
  • 6彭珂文,沈比先,黎刚,田荪,孙冰,古治梅.降低照射剂量在头颅多排CT中的临床应用[J].放射学实践,2006,21(4):397-399. 被引量:6
  • 7朱晓华,李士骏,薛永明,邵江,史景云,尤正千.胸部CT低剂量扫描的图像质量与吸收剂量关系分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2003,37(10):945-950. 被引量:136
  • 8Brenner D,Elliston C, Hall E.et al. Estimated Risks of RadiationInduced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT[J]. AJR, 2001,176 (2): 289-296.
  • 9Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, et al. Standard-dose and 50 %reduced-dose Chest CT: Comparing the Effect on Image Quality [J]. AJR,2002,179(2) :461-465.
  • 10Kalra MK,Maher MM,Toth TL,et al. Strategies for CT Radiation dose Optimization[J]. Radiology, 2004,230 (3) : 619-628.

二级参考文献23

  • 1[5]IEC 1223-2-6 constancy test-X-ray equipment for computed tomography. Interationl electrotechnical commission, 1994, 11
  • 2[6]Crespi A, Leoni S, Montanari G,et al. The evaluation of the physical characteristics of a volumetric computer tomography. Radiol Med (Torino), 1996, 91:460
  • 3[8]Verellen D, Vinh-Hung V, Bijdekerke P,et al. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option. Radiother Oncol, 1999, 50:355
  • 4[9]McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys, 1999, 26:2223
  • 5[1]Smith A, Shah GA, Kron T. Variation of patient dose in head CT. Br J Radiol, 1998, 71:1296
  • 6[2]Hidajat N, Schroder RJ, Wolf M,et al. Dosage values for characterization of patient exposure in computerized tomography and their significance for risk assessment. Radiology, 1997, 37:464
  • 7[3]Heinz-Peer G, Weninger F, Nowotny R,et al. Radiation dosage of various CT techniques in diagnostic lung imaging. Radiology, 1996, 36:470
  • 8崔世民 王怡 谢文石 译.计算机体层成像[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.144-145.
  • 9Kalra MK,Maher MM , Toth TL ,et al . St rategies for CT Radiation dose Optimization[J] . Radiology ,2004 ,230 (3) :619-628.
  • 10Cohnen M ,Fischer H ,Hamacher J ,et al . CT of the Head by Use of Reduced Current and Kilovoltage : Relationship between Image Quality and Dose Reduction[J] . AJNR ,2000 ,21 (10) :1654-1660.

共引文献149

同被引文献17

  • 1白玫,彭明辰.X线CT成像质量评估中的调制传递函数的测试与分析[J].医疗设备信息,2006,21(5):11-13. 被引量:15
  • 2The Phantom Laboratory. Part number CTP579[ EB/OL]. 2013-04- 24. http ://www. phantomlab, corn/library/pdf/CTP579_DS, pdf.
  • 3The Phantom Laboratory. Catphan 500 and 600 manual [EB/OL]. 2013-04-23. http://www, phantomlab, corn/library/ pdf/catphan500 -600manual. pdf.
  • 4Funama Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low, contrast detectability at abdominal muhisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique : phantom study. Radiolo. 2005,237 : 905 -910.
  • 5Tang K, Wang L, Li R, et al. Effect of low tube voltage on image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability at abdominal multidetector CT : phantom study. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2012, 2012 : 130169.
  • 6Ver FR, Theumann N, Poletti PA, et al. Impact of the introduction of 16-row MDCT on image quality and patient dose:phantom study and multi-centre survey. Eur Radio1,2006,16:2866-2874.
  • 7Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, et al. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast : analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology ,2002,224:757-763.
  • 8Goo HW. CT Radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radial ,2012,13 : 1-11.
  • 9McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, et al. CT Dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology,2011,259:311-316.
  • 10于红,李惠民,袁正,李霄麟.体部MDCT血管造影中噪声测量点的选择[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2009,15(2):186-188. 被引量:11

引证文献2

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部