期刊文献+

论信访制度在解决社会纠纷中的困境与完善

On the Difficult Position of the System of Petition Letter in Settling Social Disputes and Its Improvement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在实际运行中尽管新《信访条例》赋予了信访具有解决社会纠纷这一功能,但由于信访制度在目的、对象、性质及方式定位与其解决社会纠纷的功能没有实现有效的衔接,导致信访在解决社会纠纷中责重权轻,无法发挥其应有的功能。只有将信访的目的、对象、机构、方式置于纠纷解决的框架下,才能使其在实践中真正具备纠纷解决的功效。 In actual practice, although it has the function of settling social disputes in the new Regulations on Letters of Petition and Personal Petition, the system of petition letter can not display its function in settling social disputes because its goals, its objects, its nature and the orientation of its ways can not be linked effectively with its function in settling social disputes. Only its goals, its objects, its organizations, its ways have been set under the frame of settling social disputes, can it truly have the efficacy of settling social disputes in practice.
作者 陈发桂
机构地区 广西区委党校
出处 《桂海论丛》 2007年第3期72-74,共3页 Guihai Tribune
关键词 信访 解决纠纷 功效 petition letter , settling social disputes efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1林莉红.论行政救济的原则[J].法制与社会发展,1999,5(4):26-31. 被引量:23
  • 2余军,尹伟琴.对作为行政诉讼“通道”的功能性概念的再认识[J].政法论坛,2005,23(1):84-91. 被引量:9
  • 3王亚新.《民事诉讼中的依法审判原则和程序保障》[A].梁治平.《法律解释问题》[C].法律出版社,1998年版.第150页.
  • 4胡建森主编.《行政法学》,复旦大学出版社2003年版,第78页.
  • 5Philip J. Hatter, Dispute Resolution and Administrative Law: The History, need and Future of a Complex Relationship, 29 Vill. L. Rew 1984.
  • 6[日]棚濑孝雄.《纠纷解决过程的理论框架》,载棚濑孝雄.《纠纷的解决与审判制度》,王亚新译,中国政法大学出版社,1994年版,第1—18页,第10页,第85—99页,第14-17页.
  • 7王亚新.《纠纷,秩序,法治—探寻研究纠纷处理与规范形成的理论框架》[J].清华法律评论,清华大学出版社,1999,2.
  • 8Laurence Boulle, ADR Applications in Administrative Law, Acta Juridical, 1993.
  • 9Valerie A. Sanchez, Towards a History of ADR: The Dispute Processing Continuum in Anglo - Saxon England and Today, 11 Ohio St. J. on Disp . Resol. 2 1996.
  • 10Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 Yale Law Journal, pp. 1073 - 1075.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部