论恢复性司法的两大理论缺陷

On the Two Theories Defects of the Instauration Judicatory

恢复性司法认为犯罪主要是对被害人的损害。因此,恢复性司法过程授权被害人有效地参与确定犯罪人义务的活动,而犯罪人的主要义务是对被害人应当承担的义务。但从犯罪本质和刑事责任两个角度,对恢复性司法的基础理论进行深刻的反思,其是没有根据的,且会导致了一系列的理论矛盾。恢复性司法作为一场世界性刑事政策运动,具有片面的真理性,可以借鉴,但不可以照搬。

In the theory of instauration judicatory, crime is defined in the injury for the victim. Therefore, in its process, the victim carl be effectively ＂allowed to take part in the activities of confirming the criminal＇s obliga tions. However, the criminal mainly undertakes obligations for the victim. It is no bases to review its basic theories in the two aspects of criminal nature and penal responsibilities, which also results in the series of theory contradictions. As a global penal policy activity, instauration judicatory is unilaterally reasonable, but it can be used for reference instead of copy.