期刊文献+

论欧盟金融服务法中的最低限度协调原则

The Principle of Minimal Harmonization in EU Financial Services Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在欧盟金融服务法中,最低限度协调原则是指共同体立法只对各成员国金融监管规则的基本要素进行协调。这一原则尊重了成员国的国家主权,有助于降低金融服务市场一体化的政策成本,并能够充分发挥市场机制的作用以促成最优的监管标准。《欧共体条约》中的特别协调条款是这一原则的直接依据,金融服务指令中的协调条款是其集中体现。最低限度协调原则只适用于符合共同利益的非歧视性限制措施。在其适用范围内,各成员国只能进行执行性立法。该原则的确立和推行是以相互承认为核心、以母国控制为表现形式的一体化模式成功运用的必然结果。晚近的立法实践表明,这一原则有被边缘化的危险。 In EU financial services law, the principle of minimal harmonization aims at the approximation of national financial requirements by Community legislation. Legal harmonization is based on the special harmonization clauses of EC Treaty, and embodied in the harmonization provisions in financial directives. Only non-discriminatory national restrictions fall in the scope of this principle, in which Member States can only lay down implementing measures. Minimal harmonization respects the national sovereignty, reduces the policy costs of financial integration, as well as motivates regulatory competition to form the most optimal regulatory standards. This principle developed from the success of the integration instrument of mutual recognition. Recent practice has suggested the danger of its being marginalised.
作者 刘轶
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期164-169,共6页 Hebei Law Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2005年度重大研究项目"二十一世纪国际金融法律制度创新与发展研究"(05JJD820005)的阶段性成果
关键词 欧盟 金融服务法 基本原则 最低限度协调 European Union financial services law general principles minimal harmonization
  • 相关文献

参考文献60

  • 1J.P.Trachtman.Trade in Financial Services under GATS,NAFTA and the EC:A Regulatory Jurisdiction Analysis[J].Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,1995,(1):p93,p96.
  • 2M.Dougan.Minimum Harmonization and the Internal Market[J].Common Market Law Review,2000,(4):p855,p857.
  • 3A.Gkoutzinis.Cross-border Electronic Banking Activities in the Single European Market and the Normative Value of Home Country Supervision[J].Journal of International Banking Regulation,2003,(1):85.
  • 4F.Capriglione.Freedom of Establishment and Provision of Services[J].European Business Law Review,2004,(3):451.
  • 5G.Hertig.Regulatory Competition for EU Financial Services[J].Journal of International Economic Law,2000,(2):354.
  • 6M.希尔夫,朱益宇,黄列.权力,规则和原则——哪一个是WTO/GATT的法律导向?[J].环球法律评论,2001,23(2):133-143. 被引量:20
  • 7A.Gkoutzinis.Free Movement of Services in the EC Treaty and the Law of Contractual Obligations Relating to Banking and Financial Services[J].Common Market Law Review,2004,(1):150,151.
  • 8李仁真,刘轶.论欧盟金融服务法中的相互承认原则[J].法学评论,2006,24(4):77-84. 被引量:12
  • 9W.Gerven.Harmonisation of Private Law:Do We Need It?[J].Common Market Law Review,2004,(2):507.
  • 10S.K.Schmidt.The Impact of Mutual Recognition:Inbuilt Limits and Domestic Response to the Single Market[J].Journal of European Public Policy,December,2002,(5):73,944.

二级参考文献71

  • 1Directive 77/92/EEC, Recitals (1) and (6)
  • 2Directive 73/183/EEC, Art. 3 (1)
  • 3Directive 77/780/EEC, Art. 3 (2).
  • 4C - 120/78, Rewe - Zentral v. Bundesmonopolverwahung fur Branntwein, [ 1979 ] ECR 649.
  • 5C - 120/78, Rewe - Zentral v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein, [ 1979 ] ECR 649, para. 8.
  • 6Commission of the European Communities, Completing the Internal Market : White Paper from the Commission to the European Counil, COM (85) 310 FINAL, June 14, 1985, para. 102,77-79.
  • 7G. Zavvos, Banking Integration in the European Market, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, Vol. 9, p.574.
  • 8Single European Act, Art. 19.
  • 9Directive 92/96/EEC, Recital (6)
  • 10Directive 92/49/EEC, Recital (5)

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部