期刊文献+

参数空间分布对非点源污染模拟的影响 被引量:9

Effects of Parameter Spatial Distribution on Non-point Pollution Source Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以大宁河流域为研究区域,应用非点源模型SWAT(soil and water assessmentt001),模拟了参数空间分布对流域径流和营养物质流失的影响.利用大宁河流域巫溪水文站,2000~2004年的实测数据对模型进行了率定和验证,将流域划分为6种数量不等的子流域,利用相同的模型参数输入,模拟了不同的流域划分方案对径流和营养物质流失的影响.结果表明,不同的流域划分方案,年平均流量的最大相对误差为19.6%,6种方案年平均流量的效率系数为0.52~0.82,月平均流量的效率系数为0.80~0.83,随着子流域数量的增加,径流量出现了先下降、后上升的趋势;有机氮和有机磷的最大相对误差分别为16.2%和7.7%,不同的流域划分方案对营养物质的流失产生了轻微的影响,但没有明显的变化趋势和规律. The SWAT model was used to simulate the effects of parameter spatial distribution on flow and nutrients loadings in the Daning river watershed. It was first calibrated and validated using the measured data for the period of 2000 - 2004. Then the model was used to simulate the effects of watershed delineation scenarios on flow and nutrients loadings, using six watershed delineations, each with a different number of sub-watersheds. The max relative error is 19.6% for the annual mean flow under different watershed delineation scenarios. The flow increase first and then decrease with the number of sab-watersheds. The efficiencies coefficient is 0.52 - 0.82 for annual mean flow and 0.80 - 0.83 for monthly mean flow under six delineation scenarios. Outlet nutrients simulations are slightly affected by changes in watershed delineation scenarios. The relative errors of organic nitrogen and organic phosphorous are 16.2 % and 7.7 % respectively and no exphcit trend is observed.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期1425-1429,共5页 Environmental Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2003CB415204) 博士点专项基金项目(20050027011)
关键词 划分方案 非点源污染 子流域 率定 delineation scenario non-point pollution sources sub-watersbed calibration
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Huisman J A,Breuer L,Frede H G.Sensitivity of simulated hydrological fluxes towards changes in soil properties in response to land use change[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2004,29(11-12):749~758.
  • 2Kang M S,Park S W,Lee J J,et al Applying SWAT for TMDL programs to a small watershed containing rice paddy fields[J].Agricultural Water Management,2006,79(1):72~92.
  • 3Bouraoui F,Benabdallah S,Jrad A,et al.Application of the SWAT model on the Medjerda river basin(Tunisia)[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2005,30(8-10):497~507.
  • 4Tripathi M P,Panda R K,Raghuwanshi N S.Identification and Prioritisation of Critical Sub-watersheds for soil Conservation Management using the SWAT Model[J].Biosystems Engineering,2003,85(3):365~379.
  • 5Arnold J G,Srinivasan R,Muttiab R S,et al.Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part Ⅰ:model development[J].Journal of American Water Resources Association,1998,34(1):73~89.
  • 6Francos A,Bidoglio G,Galbiati L,et al.Hydrological and water quality modeling in a medium-sized coastal basin[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth(B),2001,26(1):47~52.
  • 7Fohrer N,Haverkamp S,Eckhardt K,et al.Hydrologic respomse to land use changes on the catchment scale[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth(B),2001,26(7-8):577~582.
  • 8Arnold J G,Srinivasan R,Ramanarayanan T S,et al.Water sources of the Texas Gulf Basin[J].Water Science and Technology,1999,39(3):121~133.
  • 9Heuvelmans G,Muys B,Feyen J.Evaluation of hydrological model parameter transferability for simulating the impact of land use on catchment hydrology[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2004,29(11-12):739~747.
  • 10Chaplot V.Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff,sediment,and NO3-N loads predictions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005,312(1-4):207~222.

二级参考文献55

  • 1张建云,A.Dowley,M.Bruen.地理信息系统及其在水文水资源中的应用[J].水科学进展,1995,6(4):290-296. 被引量:10
  • 2张仁杰.从遥感信息到水文模型参数[J].遥感信息,1987,(1):13-18,28.
  • 3Williams J R and J E Pinder II. Groundwater flow and runoff a coastal plain stream. Water Resources Bulletin,1990,726(2) :343~352.
  • 4Arnold J G P M, Allen G, Bernhardt. A comprehensive surface~groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 1993, (142) :47~69.
  • 5Reay W G D L, Gallagher, Jr G M. Simmons. Groundwater discharge and its impact on surface water quality in a Chesapeake Bay inlet. Groundwater, 1992,28(6) :1121~1133.
  • 6Memon B A. Quantitative analysis of springs. Environ Geol. 1995, (26): 111~120.
  • 7Wood W W W E. Sanford. Chemical and isotopic methods for quantifying groundwater recharge in a regional semiarid environment. Groundwater, 1997,(33) :458~468.
  • 8Meyboom P. Estimating groundwater recharge from streamflow hydrograph. Journal of Geophysical Research,1961,66(4) : 1203~ 1214.
  • 9Knisel W G. Baseflow recession analysis for comparison of drainage basins and geology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1963, (68) : 3649~3653.
  • 10Nathan R J and T A McMahon. Evaluation of Automated Techniques for Baseflow and Recession Analysis.Water Resources Research, 1990,26(7) : 1465~1473.

共引文献129

同被引文献236

引证文献9

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部