期刊文献+

大学生择偶偏爱性别差异及其与一般社会信念的关系 被引量:17

Progress of Psychological Research on Jealousy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察当代大学生的择偶偏爱性别差异,探讨大学生的择偶偏爱的类型,并探讨择偶偏爱与一般社会信念的关系。方法:对来自北京6所高校大学生563名进行分析,采用择偶偏爱问卷和一般社会信念问卷。结果:①女性在有高薪潜力的、受过高等教育的、高社会地位的等14个因素上比男性更为偏爱,男性较女性更为偏爱的仅有4项,包括外貌有吸引力,形象性感、比本人年轻和擅长家务的;②大学生择偶偏爱类型可以分为经济取向、性格取向和生理取向,女性偏爱性格取向和经济取向,男性偏爱生理取向;③一般社会信念对于大学生择偶偏爱具有显著的预测作用。 Objective: The aim of this article is to explore the gender differences of mate preference and the relationship between mate preferences and general social beliefs. Methods: Questionnaire of Traits Desired in a Date and Social Axioms Survey were respectively administered to 563 Chinese university students in Beijing. Results: ①Gender difference was found among 18 traits, women expressed stronger preference than men on 14 items, including high earnings potential, high education, high social status; but men expressed stronger preference than women in only 4 items: physically attractive, sexy looking, younger age, and good house-keeper. ②Three factors were found in the structure of mate preferences, namely economic oriented, character oriented and physical oriented; women prefer the first two, and men prefer the last one. ③The general social beliefs had significant power to predict the mate preference of university students.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2007年第3期270-272,281,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 择偶偏爱 性别差异 一般社会信念 大学生 Mate preference Gender difference General social beliefs University students
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sprecher S,Quintin S,Elaine H.Mate selection preferences:Gender differences examined in a national sample,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,66:1074-1080
  • 2Hatfleld E.Susan S.Men's woman's mate preferences in the United States,Russia,and Japan.Journal of Crosscultural Psychology,1995,26:728-750
  • 3Buss DM.Sex difierences in human mate preferences:Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1989,12:1-49,1989
  • 4Buss DM,Max A,Alois A,et al.International Prefefences in selecting mates:A study of 37 cultures.Journal of Crosscultural Psychology,1999,21:5-47
  • 5Maura Toro-Morn,Susan S.A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students:The United States vs.the People's Republic of China(PRC).Journal of Comparative Family Studies,Spring,2003,34(2):151-170
  • 6Kwok L,Michael HB,Sharon Reimel de Carrasquel,et al.Social axioms:The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology,2002,33(3):286-302
  • 7陈丽娜,张建新.大学生一般社会信念与人际冲突解决策略的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):151-153. 被引量:16
  • 8苏巧荣.青年学生择偶、择友期望行为的实验研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2002,11(2):208-209. 被引量:2
  • 9乐国安,陈浩,张彦彦.进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):561-568. 被引量:52

二级参考文献11

  • 1张亮.婚姻,是一块跳板?——从征婚广告看女性择偶的心态[J].社会,2000,20(7):30-31. 被引量:3
  • 2乐国安,张彦彦,陈浩.西方有关择偶启事的研究和论争[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(2):248-256. 被引量:11
  • 3苏巧荣 王晓忠.父母养育行为与儿童成长[J].中华医学理论与实践新进展,2001,1(2):94-95.
  • 4[1]Krech D, Crutchfield RS. Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York, McGraw-Hill,1948.151
  • 5[2]Kwok L, Michael HB, Sharon Reimel de Carrasquel,et al. Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 2002,33(3):286-302
  • 6[3]Spector PE. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 1982,91: 482-497
  • 7[4]Sigel ID, McGillicuddy DA, Goodnow JJ. Parental Belief Systems: The Psychological Consequences for Children. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992
  • 8[6]Morris MW,Williams KY,Leung K,et al.Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences, Journal of International Business Studies,Fourth Quarter,1998,29(4):737
  • 9[7]Hui HH,Chen L,Zhang JX,et al.Social Beliefs and Values of modern Chinese: Cross-cultural comparisons of university students in Hong Kong and Beijing,6th Regional Congress of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology in Budapest, Hungary,2003, 7
  • 10[8]Graziano William G, Jensen Campbell Lauri A,Hair Elizabeth C.Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996,70(4):820-835

共引文献67

同被引文献254

引证文献17

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部