期刊文献+

格调与感悟──兼谈谢灵运诗歌的被解读与王夫之对谢灵运诗歌的批评 被引量:1

Styles and Senses——Understanding Xie Lin-yun′s Poetry and Wang Fuzhi′s Criticism to the Poetry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以谢灵运诗歌的被解读历程及王夫之对谢灵运诗的批评分别说明格调与感悟这两种诗歌鉴赏方法存在的长处与不足。格调作为人们对诗歌创作的理性归纳,它有助于人们对诗歌的理解和认识,但它无法说明诗歌中幽微的情感表现;感悟虽能帮助人们鉴赏诗歌中的情感幽微,但它须以鉴赏者与诗人心灵的共鸣为前提,带有主观性和不确定性。诗歌鉴赏要做到真实与准确,就应该综合二者之所长,力避它们之所短。 The comprehensive progress of Xie Lin-yun's poetry and the Wang Fu-zhi's criticism to the poetry separately illustrated advantages and disadvantages of style and senses as two methods to appreciate poetry. The style, as a rational induction of writing poems, is helpful for people to understand the poetry, but is hard to show the fine sentiments containing in poetry; the senses is helpful to appreciate the fine sentiments in poetry, but needs a premise of resonance between appreciator and writer with subjectivity and uncertainty. The reality and accuracy appreciating poetry lie in combining the style and senses to avoid their own shortages.
作者 黄河
机构地区 华侨大学文学院
出处 《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2007年第2期81-89,共9页 Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词 格调 感悟 谢灵运 王夫之 style sense Xie Lin-yun Wang Fu-zhi
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[2]孟轲.孟子[M].长春:长春出版社诸子集成本,1999.
  • 2[3]庄周.庄子[M].长春:长春出版社诸子集成本,1999.
  • 3[4]古代文学理论研究丛刊[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
  • 4[6]肖子显.南齐书[M].北京:中华书局排印本,1972.
  • 5[9]全唐诗[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
  • 6何文焕.历代诗话[M].北京:中华书局,1981.594.
  • 7[5]王夫之. 船山全书[M].长沙: 岳麓书社,1996.
  • 8[12]方东树.昭昧詹言[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1965.
  • 9[13]范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1964.

共引文献73

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部