期刊文献+

AF椎弓根固定技术治疗骨质疏松伴胸腰椎骨折脱位疗效分析 被引量:4

AF pedicle fixation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar fracture with osteoporosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨AF椎弓根固定技术治疗骨质疏松伴胸腰椎骨折脱位效果。方法回顾分析29例患者术前术后临床及影像学资料和随访结果,测量矢状指数、椎体压缩高度、后凸畸形Cobb角,评估植骨融合的远期治疗效果。结果术后随访3-48个月,骨折复位满意,椎体高度矢状径指数从伤前的41%恢复到术后的92%,未发生螺钉断裂或脱出现象。22例二次术后18个月取出内固定后随访12-36个月,椎体高度矢状径指数为91%,X线片未见后凸加重或变形,未出现再次塌陷。结论骨质疏松伴胸腰椎骨折脱位应采用综合治疗,有效的椎弓根复位固定技术、撬拨复位恢复椎体高度及充足可靠的植骨融合技术是保持良好疗效的关键。 Objective To study the effect of AF pedicle fixation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar fracture with osteoporosis. Methods 29 cases were analyzed retrospectively, including pre- and postoperative clinical and images data, sagittal index, vertebral body height, kyphosis Cobb angle. Long term effect of bone graft fusion was evaluated. Results All cases were followed up for 3 - 48 months. All fractures got satisfactory reduction. Sagittal index of vertebral body height was restored from 41% to 92%. No screw breakage or protrusion was found. 22 cases got implants removal in 18 months, and continued to be followed up for 12 - 36 months. Sagittal index of vertebral body height was 91%. No aggravation of kypbosis, deformity or collapse was found. Conclusions Osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar fracture should be treated comprehensively. The key points are effective transpedicle reduction and fixation, prizing reduction to restore vertebral height, and sufficient bone graft and reliable fusion skills.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2007年第3期232-234,共3页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 骨质疏松 脊柱骨折 椎弓根螺钉 骨折固定术 osteoporosis spinal fractures pedicles crew fracture fixation, internal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1李慧友,朱青安,李桂兰,钟世镇,卢海俊,李忠华.单侧小关节分级切除对腰椎稳定性影响的三维运动研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1996,6(5):206-209. 被引量:24
  • 2Blumenthal SL, Gill K. Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine, 1993,18 (9): 1186.
  • 3Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity.Spine, 2001, 26 (13): 1473.
  • 4Christensen FB, Laursen M, Gelineck J, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: the need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine, 2001, 26 (5): 538.
  • 5Kim NH,Lee HM,Chun IM.Neurologic injury and recovery in patients with burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine[J].Spine,1999,24 (3):290-294.
  • 6Sirado O,Kaneda K,Tadano S,et al.Influence of disc degeneration on mechanism of thoracolumbar burst fractures[J].Spine,1992,17 (3):286-292.
  • 7Tran NT,Watson NA,Tencer AF,et al.Mechanism of burst fracture in thoracolumbar spine:the effect of loading rate[J].Spine,1995,20 (18):1984-1988.
  • 8郭世绂,胥少汀.脊髓损伤(基础与临床)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.360-362.
  • 9Brightman RP,Miller CA,Rea GL,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging of trauma to the thoracic and lumbar spine:the importance of the posterior longitudinal ligament[J].Spine,1992,17(5):541-548.
  • 10Willen JA,Gaekwad UH,Kakulas BA.Acute burst fractures:a comparative analysis of a modern fracture classification and pathologic finding[J].Clin Orthop,1992,276:169-174.

共引文献40

同被引文献77

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部