摘要
The flow-field of a propane-air diffusion flame combustor with interior and exterior conjugate heat transfers was numerically studied.Results obtained from four combustion models,combined with the re-normalization group(RNG) k-ε turbulence model,discrete ordinates radiation model and enhanced wall treatment are presented and discussed.The results are compared with a comprehensive database obtained from a series of experimental measurements.The flow patterns and the recirculation zone length in the combustion chamber are accurately predicted,and the mean axial velocities are in fairly good agreement with the experimental data,particularly at downstream sections for all four combustion models.The mean temperature profiles are captured fairly well by the eddy dissipation(EDS),probability density function(PDF),and laminar flamelet combustion models.However,the EDS-finite-rate combustion model fails to provide an acceptable temperature field.In general,the flamelet model illustrates little superiority over the PDF model,and to some extent the PDF model shows better performance than the EDS model.
The flow-field of a propane-air diffusion flame combustor with interior and exterior conjugate heat transfers was numerically studied. Results obtained from four combustion models, combined with the re-normalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model,discrete ordinates radiation model and enhanced wall treatment are presented and discussed. The results are compared with a comprehensive database obtained from a series of experimental measurements. The flow patterns and the recirculation zone length in the combustion chamber are accurately predicted,and the mean axial velocities are in fairly good agreement with the experimental data, particularly at downstream sections for all four combustion models. The mean temperature profiles are captured fairly well by the eddy dissipation (EDS), probability density function (PDF), and laminar flamelet combustion models. However, the EDS-finite-rate combustion model fails to provide an acceptable temperature field. In general,the flamelet model illustrates little superiority over the PDF model, and to some extent the PDF model shows better performance than the EDS model.
出处
《航空动力学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第5期694-703,共10页
Journal of Aerospace Power
关键词
燃烧室
燃烧模型
扩散火焰
热转移
combustion model
flamelet model
diffusion flame combustor; conjugate heat transfer