摘要
从关于海运索赔中承运人过失举证责任分配的国际立法的历史变化和部分国内立法的有关规定对举证责任分配诸学说的挑战中得到的启示是,不存在举证责任分配的一般性标准,更不应过于迷信罗森贝克的规范说;举证责任分配与民事责任之间存在密切联系;我国目前可以考虑用法律解释的方法解决举证责任分配问题。
Judging from the historical change of international legislation concerning the onus probandi allocation of the carrier in sea transportation claims and from the challenges of theories of the onus probandi by some of China's legislative regulations, there is not a general standard for the allocation of onus probandi. There is a close relationship between this allocation and civil responsibility. In present age, China can consider solve the allocation of onus probandi by means of legal explanation.
出处
《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》
2007年第2期110-120,共11页
Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)