期刊文献+

耐胃肠道环境及肠道病原菌拮抗的猪源乳酸菌的分离与筛选 被引量:18

Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Pig Additives and the Study of Its Probiotic Properties in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从健康猪粪便筛选分离到对肠道致病菌有较强抑制特性的3株乳酸菌,分别鉴定为屎肠球菌(Enterococcus faecium)、粪肠球菌(Enterococcus faecalis)和干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus casei)。体外益生特性研究表明:3株乳酸菌能耐受胃肠道环境,能黏附猪小肠表面粘液,对猪源产肠毒素型大肠杆菌(Escherichia coli O139,E. coli O139)、E. coli C83905、E. coli C83524、E. coli C83529、伤寒沙门氏菌(Salmonella typhimurium O4Hi,ST O4 Hi)、金黄色葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus aureus,SA)均有较强的抑制特性。对小白鼠肠道大肠杆菌的数量进行研究,结果证明对照组大肠杆菌数量没有明显降低,而添加乳酸菌组大肠杆菌数量明显降低。对小白鼠腹腔注射E. coliC83905,乳酸菌组死亡率明显小于对照组。结果证明3株乳酸菌在猪饲料添加剂方面有较好的应用前景。 The lactic acid bacteria(LAB) in this experiment were isolated from the faeces of local healthy pigs. Three of them were most tolerant to in vitro antagonism of enteric pathogenic microorganisms. They were identified as Enterococcus faecium,Enterococcus faecalis and Lactobacillus casei. All of them can survive in the gastrointestinal tract and be bound to immobilized mucus material in vitro. They had antimicrobial activities against enteric pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli O139,E. coli C83905, E. coli C83524, E. coli C83529, Salmonella typhimurium O4Hi and Staphylococcus aureus. The faecal E. Coli counts of mice were also studied. The changes in the total E. coli population in the control groups were not significant. In the groups fed probiotics, the viable E. coli counts were significantly decreased. All the mice were injected intraperitoneally with E. coli C83905,and the death of the LAB used groups were significantly less than the control group. These results indicated that the three isolates could be used as suitable strains for widespread use in the pig additives.
出处 《华中农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期348-352,共5页 Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University
基金 浙江省重大科技攻关项目(2004C12010)资助
关键词 乳酸菌 筛选 鉴定 益生特性 porcine lactic acid bacteria screening identification probiotic properties
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李凯年.饲用抗生素的淡出已是大势所趋[J].中国动物保健,2005,7(8):39-41. 被引量:9
  • 2杨革.微生物学实验教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
  • 3布坎南 R E,吉本斯 N E.伯杰细菌鉴定手册[M].8版.北京:科学出版社,1984.
  • 4PEDERSEN C,JONSSON H,LINDBERG J E,et al.Microbiological characterization of wet wheat distillers' grain,with focus on isolation of lactobacilli with potential as probiotics[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2004,70(3):1522-1527.
  • 5CASEY P G,CASEY G D,GARDINER G E,et al.Isolation and characterization of anti-Salmonella lactic acid bacteria from the porcine gastrointestinal tract[J].Lett Appl Microbiol,2004,39:431-438.
  • 6马玉龙,许梓荣,尤萍.双歧杆菌对病原菌粘附肉鸡肠粘液的影响[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2004,22(1):90-93. 被引量:2
  • 7ROOS S,KARNER F,AXELSSON L,et al.Lactobacillus mucosae sp.nov,a new species with in vitro mucus-binding activity isolated from pig intestine[J].Int J Syst Evol Microbiol,2000,50:251-258.
  • 8KOS B,SUSKOVIC J,GORETA J,et al.Effect of protectors on the viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92 in simulated gastrointestinal conditions[J].Food Technol Biotechnol,2000,38:121-127.
  • 9EWING W N.The living gut[M].Nottingham:University of Nottingham,1994.
  • 10FULLER R.A review probiotics in man and animals[J].J Appl Bacteriol,1989,66:365-378.

二级参考文献1

共引文献16

同被引文献209

引证文献18

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部