摘要
文章运用博弈论及经济学的有关原理,在国内外企业及政府处于多方完全信息博弈时,按照国内社会福利最大化的原则,分别推导出“一国一税”政策下的单一反倾销税率以及“分别税率”政策下的反倾销税率。通过对两者进行比较分析,发现欧美对华的“一国一税”政策不只是一种歧视性政策,而且是一种无法达到“多赢”的政策。文章建议我国政府和企业应运用多种手段应对“一国一税”政策。
At first, according to the relevant theories of game and economics, this paper derives the model to calculate AD rate below the two different policies,which is based on current regulations of AD and maximal principles of domestic social welfare respectively under the game of complete information.Secondly,according to the contrast between two analytical results, the paper discovers the EU and US's single AD duty policy for China is not only a kind of bias policy,but also a kind of policy that can not attain "multi-win".At last,the author suggests our national government and business enterprises should make use of various means to respond to the single AD duty policy.
出处
《国际经贸探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第6期71-74,共4页
International Economics and Trade Research
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"优化反倾销税率模型的理论研究与实证分析"(70673061)
关键词
反倾销
“一国一税”政策
完全信息博弈
社会福利最大化
AD (anti-dumping)
single duty policy
complete information game
social welfare maximization