摘要
两岸仲裁立法都将自由、效率、公正的价值融会于各自仲裁法的每一个原则、规范、程序之中,但由于政治背景、法律渊源、价值观念的不同,在对自由、效率、公正价值的表现方式、体现程度上各不相同,在一定程度上制约了仲裁功能的发挥。台湾地区的仲裁制度更具国际化和自由性,而大陆的仲裁裁决具有更高的效力和效率,两岸仲裁法均蕴含了法的公正价值,但仍有不足。通过比较分析,相互弥补与借鉴,完善立法,能最大限度地实现仲裁的自由、效率、公正价值。
The value of freedom, efficiency and justness has turned to the principles, specification, and program of law while arbitral tribuals on both banks are making laws. However, as the difference of political backgrounds, law springheads, and value between the both, it exemplifies differently. There are shortcomings as well as success, which limit the ability of arbitration in scope or extent. In order to realize freedom, efficiency and justness of arbitration fully,we'd better learn from their success and shortcomings by the comparison between the two,covering the shortage and perfecting the law.
出处
《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
北大核心
2007年第3期54-59,共6页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
2005年江西省社会科学研究规划学科共建项目"两岸商事仲裁法律制度比较研究"(05SH251)阶段性成果
关键词
台湾地区
大陆
仲裁法
自由价值
公正价值
效率价值
Taiwan
China' s mainland
arbitration
freedom value
justice value
effect value