期刊文献+

后腹腔镜肾盂、输尿管切开取石术(附86例报告) 被引量:6

Retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy (report of 86 cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术治疗肾盂及输尿管中上段结石的应用价值。方法施行后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术86例。男48例,女38例;年龄16~72岁,平均38岁。结石直径0.8~3.2cm。左侧44例,右侧42例。其中肾盂结石6例,输尿管上段74例,中段6例,均为阳性结石。18例曾行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(USL)。结果结石均1次取净。手术时间50~200min,平均70min;术后住院4~8d。结论后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术可成为较大、质硬、长期嵌顿性肾盂输尿管中上段结石的一线治疗方法;可作为ESWL和腔内治疗失败的补救治疗措施。 [Objective] To assess the clinical value of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy (RPPL) and retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithetomy (RPUL) in treating renal pelvis or ureteral calculus. [Methods] A tolal of 86 patients with renal pelvis or ureteral calculi underwent RPPL and RPUL. 48 were man and 38 were women. Their age ranged from 16 to 72 years (mean, 38years). The calculis were found on left side in 44 cases and on right side in 42 cases. The calculis were 0.8 to 3.2cm in diameters. Pyelolithiasis occurred in 6 cases, upper ureteral calculi in 34 cases, and middle in 6 cases. 18 had experienced unsuccessful ESWL or ureterorenolithotripsy (URL). [Results] All the stones were completely removed by single procedure. The operation was between 50 and 200 min with a mean of 70 min, and the hospital stay was from 4 to 8 days. [Conclusions] Patients selected with large, hard, radioparent, chronically impacted pelvis or upper ureteral stones RPPL and RPUL may be considered as the first-line treatment and as a salvage procedure for failed ESWL and endoscopy.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期596-597,共2页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 肾盂结石 输尿管结石 后腹腔镜 pelvis calculi ureteral calculi laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

  • 1陆曙炎,陈建国,张焕兴,周忠兴,邹建钢,吴小鹏,陈仰之,陈静,刘伟民,高谷深.后腹腔镜手术治疗泌尿系疾病(附23例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(2):110-112. 被引量:113
  • 2李龙承 张旭主.泌尿外科手术图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.157-158.
  • 3Nualyong C, Taweemonkongsap T. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi. J Med Assoc Thai, 1999,82:1028--1033.
  • 4Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai M R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 339-- 343.
  • 5Keeley FX, Gialas I, Pillai M, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy:the Edinburgh experience. BJU Int, 1999,84:765-769.
  • 6Skrepetis K, Doumas K, Siafakas I, et al. Laparoscopic versus open ureterolithotomy. A comparative study. Eur Urol,2001,40 :32-36.
  • 7Hemal AK, Goel A, Kumar M, et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery in urinary stone disease. J Endourol,2001,15:701-705.
  • 8Gaur DD, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai MR, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy:technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89: 339 -343.
  • 9Feyaerts A, Rietbergen J, Navarra S, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi. Eur Urol, 2001,40:609-613.
  • 10Gaur DD. Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: the Indian rope trick. J Endourol, 1998,12:61-66.

共引文献628

同被引文献40

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部