摘要
哲学史上不同时期不同哲学家对实践的理解有不同的论述和定论,但总体来讲,实践的基本规定有两个维度:一是技术(工具)之维,一是道德(目的)之维。德国古典哲学的实践意旨是本文的重心。现代社会实践的道德之维常被遮蔽,从而造成实践的单向度发展。当代人类应超越实践的认识论层面,立足于实践的本体论层面来建构实践哲学。实践哲学的生成对人的实践活动本身的反思和批判,具有重大意义。
At different periods in the history of philosophy, different philosophers had different viewpoints and different conclusions as to the understanding of practice. Generally speaking, for the basic provisions of practice, there are two dimensions: the dimension of technology (tools) and the dimension of moral (purposes). This paper focuses on the implication of practice based on the German classical philosophy. Since the dimension of moral of practice is often ignored in modem society, pracice is developed towards a single dimension. At present, the practice philosophy should be constructed on the basis of the ontological level of practice beyond the epistemological level of practice. The generation of the practice philosophy is of great significance to reflecting and criticizing human practice itself.
出处
《西安欧亚学院学报》
2007年第3期36-41,共6页
Journal of xi‘an Eurasia University
关键词
实践
康德
费希特
黑格尔
马克思
技术之维
道德之维
practice
Kant
Fichte
Hegel
Marx
dimension of technology
dimension of moral