期刊文献+

可行走式硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛的观察与护理

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结可行走式硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉镇痛分娩的护理效果及体会。方法选择730例产妇行可行走式硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉镇痛分娩(观察组),另选择同等条件未行分娩镇痛产妇750例为对照组。由麻醉师与助产士共同管理进行硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉镇痛分娩的产妇,实施全程严密观察与护理,并做好并发症的早期预防。结果观察组的镇痛效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01);产妇的生命体征、神经运动阻滞程度、总产程时间、阴道手术产率、剖宫产率、新生儿窒息率、产后出血率等指标两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但观察组应用催产素者明显多于对照组(P<0.01)。结论对实施可行走式硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉镇痛分娩过程中的产妇进行精心护理、密切观察和预防并发症是保证产科质量的关键。
出处 《广东医学院学报》 2007年第3期333-334,共2页 Journal of Guangdong Medical College
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Gatt SP,Crooke DK,Anderson A,et al.Pain relief and sensory and motor block in mothers receiving epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% for analgesia labour a double-blind,Paralled randomised comparison of efficacy[Z].Abstract,17th Annual Meeting
  • 2Gaiser RR,Venkateswaren P,Persily EP,et al.Comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labour and delivery[Z].Abstract SOAP Annual Meeting,1995:17-20.
  • 3Benhamou D,Hamza J,Eledjam JJ,et al.Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2mg.ml ’ for pain relief during labor[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1997
  • 4Breen TW,Shapiro T,Glass B,et al.Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.1993
  • 5Eddleston JM,Holland JJ,Griffin RP,et al.A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labor[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1996
  • 6Bloom SL,Mclntire DD,Kelly MA,et al.Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1998
  • 7Meister GC,D’ Angelo R,Owen MD,et al.A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.2000
  • 8Douglas MJ.Walking epidural analgesia in labor[].Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia.1998
  • 9王晓持.罗比卡因[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1999,20(1):10-12. 被引量:61
  • 10王义琳.产科镇痛的近期发展[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2000,21(3):153-156. 被引量:29

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部