期刊文献+

小学2~5年级儿童基于成功基础率的策略适应性 被引量:1

THE DIFFERENCE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TRENDS OF THE STRATEGY ADAPTIVITY IN GRADE 2~5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以128名小学2~5年级儿童为被试,采用BST实验任务,对策略成功基础率变化进行控制,探讨了小学儿童策略适应性差异和发展特点。结果表明:(1)在策略成功基础率变化的情况下,小学儿童策略适应性存在年级差异,表现为2年级儿童策略适应性水平低于3年级儿童,2.3年级儿童策略适应性水平低于4、5年级儿童。(2)小学儿童策略适应性发展存在阶段性,儿童在小学2~5年级内策略适应性发生了质的变化,但是这种变化是一种渐进的发展变化过程,表现为从小学2年级到4年级儿童的策略适应性呈现显著的、渐进的变化,4、5年级之间儿童策略适应性处于稳定状态。 With the base-rate of success controlled, BST tasks were used to examine the developmental differences in primary chihlren's strategy adaptivity. The participants were 128 grade 2-5 chihlren. The resuhs indicated: (1) there was grade difference in chihlren's strategy adaptivity, namely, chihlren of grade 2 were lower than those of grade 3 in strategy adaptivity, and chihlren of grade 2 and 3 were. lower than tho.se of grade 4 and 5 in strategy adaptivity. (2) chihlren's strategy adaptivity developed from phase to phase, which changed qualitatively. Children of grade 2 to 4 showed a significant and gradual trend, and ehihlren of grade 4 to 5 were in stable state.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 2007年第2期105-111,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
关键词 策略适应性 成功基础率 儿童 strategy adaptivity, base-rate of success, ehildren
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1[1]Siegler R S.Individual differences in stralegy choices:Good students,not-so-good students,and perfectionists.Child Development,1988,59(4):833-851
  • 2[2]Reder L M.Strategy selection in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,1987,19(1):90~138
  • 3[3]Lemaire P,Siegler R S.Four aspects of stralegic change:Contributions to children's learning of multiplication.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Ceneral,1995,124(1):83~97
  • 4[4]Schunn C D,Reder L.M.Another source of individual difference:Slralegy adaptivily to changing rate o success.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Ceneral,2001,130(1):59~76
  • 5[5]Schunn C D,Reder L M.Indivilual differences in stralegy adaptivity.In D.L.Medin(Ed),The psychology of learning and motivation.New York,PA:Academic Press,1998,115~154
  • 6[6]Siegler R S,Lemaire P.Older and younger adult's strategy choices in multiplication:Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Ceneral,1997,126(1):71~92
  • 7[7]KerdmAn D D,Siegler R S.Individual,differences and adaptive flexibility in lower-income children's strategy choices.Learning and Individual Differences,1993,5(2):113~136
  • 8[8]Trudy E K,Connie K V.Strategy development and learning to spell new words:Ceneralization of a process.Developmental Psychology,2005,41(1):148~159
  • 9陈英和,赵延芹,王明怡,张可娟.题目类型对加法认知策略选择影响的比较研究[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(1):1-4. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Rdeder I,M.Schunn C D.Bringing together the psychometric and strategy worlds:Predicting adaptivity in a dynamic task.In Copher & Koriat(ED).Attention and performance XVII:Cognitive regulation of performance.Interaction of theory and application.Cambridge.MA:MIT Press,1999,315~342

二级参考文献25

  • 1曾盼盼,俞国良.数学学习不良的研究及趋势[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(1):48-56. 被引量:31
  • 2朱莉琪.数学学习困难儿童解决简单加减法的认知特点的实验研究[J].中国特殊教育,1999(3):34-37. 被引量:15
  • 3刘凡.数字记忆广度对策略应用模式的影响──中美儿童计算能力差异的比较研究[J].心理科学,1994,17(1):21-27. 被引量:13
  • 4[1]Ginsberg H P.Mathematics learning disabilities:A view from developmental psychology.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1997,30(1):20~33
  • 5[3]Geary D C,Brown S C.Cognitive addition:Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted,normal,and mathematically disabled children.Developmental Psychology,1991,27 (3):398~406
  • 6[6]Siegler R S,Shipley C.Variation,Selection,and Cognitive Change.In:Simon T.& Halford G.(Eds.),Developing cognitive competence:New approaches to process modeling.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1995:31~76
  • 7Siegler R S, Patrick L. Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predications of ASCM using the choice/onchoice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1997, 126(1): 71-92
  • 8Shrager J, Siegler R S. SCADS: A model of children' s strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 1998, 9(5):405-410
  • 9Kaye D B. The development of mathematical cognition. Cognitive Development, 1986, 1: 157-170
  • 10Ericsson K A, Simon H A. Protocol analysis :Verbal reports as data.Cambridge: MIT press, 1984

共引文献3

同被引文献17

  • 1林崇德,沃建中,於国荣.儿童和青少年信息加工速度发展函数的研究[J].心理学报,1997,29(1):44-51. 被引量:6
  • 2沃建中,林崇德.信息加工速度的发展模式[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(3):1-6. 被引量:6
  • 3贺荟中,方俊明.小学生工作记忆与推理关系的实验研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):32-33. 被引量:7
  • 4白学军,臧传丽,王丽红.推理与工作记忆[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):16-21. 被引量:19
  • 5张厚粲,王晓平.瑞文标准推理测验手册(中国城市修订版).北京:北京师范大学出版社,1985:1-60.
  • 6Schunn C D, Reder L M. Strategy adaptivity and individual differences. In Medin D L (Ed), The psychology of learning and motivation. New York, PA: Academic Press, 1998, 115-154.
  • 7Baddeley A. Working Memory. Science, 1992, 255: 556- 559.
  • 8Geary D C, Hoard M K, Craven J B, et al. Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2004, 88(2) : 121 - 151.
  • 9Schunn C D, Reder L M. Another source of individual difference: Strategy adaptivity to changing rate of success. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2001, 130(1): 59-76.
  • 10Broeder A. Decision making with the adaptive toolbox: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2003, 29(4) :611 - 625.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部