期刊文献+

图形的相似性与差异性判断的关系及机制的研究 被引量:1

THE RELATION AND MECHANISM OF SIMILARITY AND DIFFERENCE JUDGEMENTS OF PICTURES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用与标准刺激特征相似和关系相似的图形组成的图片,让80名大学生被试选择与标准刺激更相似的和差异更大的图形,分析相似性和差异性判断的关系以及两种判断过程的机制。结果发现:相似性判断和差异性判断不是镜像关系;差异性判断的时间长于相似性判断的时间;在特征与关系共存的时候,特征和关系在相似性判断和差异性判断中起着不同的作用,相似性判断更多地考虑关系,差异性判断更多地考虑特征。 Two kinds of pictures were used to investigate the relation and mechanism of similarity and difference with judgements, including the pictures that have similar attribution and relation to the standard ones. 80 college students were asked to choose which was more similar to the standard pictures and which was more different from the standard ones. What followed were the analysis of the relation of similarity and difference judgements, and the mechanism of the two judgement processes. The final results showed that: Similarity and difference judgements were not mirror to each other; the reaction time of difference judgements was longer than that of similarity judgements; when the attributes and the relations were all present, they played different roles in similarity judgement and difference judgement, with relations being more attended to in similarity judgements and attributes being more attended to in difference judgement.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 2007年第2期145-149,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地06JJDXLX003项目 天津市教育科学"十一五"规划课题重点ZZG026项目的资助。
关键词 相似性判断 差异性判断 反应时 特征相似 关系相似 similarity judgement, difference judgement, reaction time, attributional similarity, relational similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]Markman A B,Gentner D.Nonintentional similarity processing.In:Hassin R,Bargh J A,Uleman J S.The new unconscious.New York:Oxford University Press,2002,107~137
  • 2[2]Levi B,Markman A B.Processes of Similarity Judgment.Cognitive Science,2005,29(6):1061~1076
  • 3阴国恩,安蓉,郑金香.分类中相似性的理论与模型[J].心理学探新,2005,25(1):41-45. 被引量:6
  • 4[4]Nosofsky R M.Examplar-based accounts of relations between classification,recognition and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory& Cognition,1988,14(4):700~708
  • 5[5]David A.Role for Category Information in Change Detection.A research paper submitted in partial completion of the requirements for Master of Arts in Psychology,2005,1~47
  • 6[6]Hasson U,Sloutsky V.M.Similarity and difference judgements under perceptual and non perceptual conditions.In Gray W,Schunn C.Proceedings of the XXIV Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,2002,4:29~434
  • 7[7]艾森克 M W,基恩 M T著,高定国,肖晓云译,荆其诚审校.认知心理学.华东师范大学出版社,2004
  • 8[8]Heit E.Features of similarity and category-based induction.In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorisation.Edinburgh,1997,115~121
  • 9[9]Markman A B,Gentner D.Structural alignment during similarity comparisons.Cognitive Psychology,1993b,25(4):431~467
  • 10[10]Medin D L,Goldstone R L,Gentner D.Similarity involving attributes and relations:Judgements of similatity and difference are not inverses.Psychology Science,1990,1(1):64~69

二级参考文献41

  • 1Anderson J R. The adaptive nature of btlman categorization. Psychological Review, 1991,98(2) : 409 -429.
  • 2Bruner J S, C, oodnow J, Austin G A. A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.
  • 3Bosch E H. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104:192-233.
  • 4Medin D L, Smith E E. Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 1984, 35 : 113 - 138.
  • 5Medin D L, Goldstone R L, Gentne D. Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference and not inverses. Psychological Science, 1990, 1 : 64 - 69.
  • 6Komatsu L K. Recent biew of conceptual structure . Psychological Bulletin,1992,112:500 -502.
  • 7Goldstone R L. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Co-ition, 1994,52:125 - 157.
  • 8Medin D L. Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 1989,44:1469-1481.
  • 9Medin D L, Goldstone R L, Gentner D. Respects for similarity Psychological Review, 1993,100 : 254 - 278.
  • 10Markman A B, Wisniewski E J. Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory & Cognition, 1997,23 : 54 -70.

共引文献13

同被引文献23

  • 1Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Parvaz, M. A., & Squires, N. K. (2006a). Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology, 43, 253 - 260.
  • 2Azizian, A. , Freitas, A. L. , Watson, T. D. , & Squires, N. K. (2006b). Electrophysiological correlates of categorization : P3 am- plitude as index of target similarity. Biological Psychology, 71,278-288.
  • 3Estes, Z. , & Hasson, U, (2004). The importance of being nonalign- able: A critical test of the structural alignment theory of similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni- tion, 30, 1082 - 1092.
  • 4Estes, Z. , Golonka, S. , & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. In B. Ross ( Ed. ) , The Psychology of Learning & Motivation, Vol. 54 ( pp. 249 - 278). Burlington : Academic Press.
  • 5Glaser, W. R. , & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop - likeword and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy:General, 118, 13 - 42.
  • 6Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judg- ments. Cognitive psychology, 23, 222-262.
  • 7Golonka, S. , & Estes, Z. (2009). Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1454 - 1464.
  • 8Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (9) , 404 - 409.
  • 9Hahn, U. , Close, C. , & Graf, M. (2009). Transformation direction influences shape - similarity judgments. Psychology science, 20,447 - 454.
  • 10Hodgetts, C. J. , Hahn, U. , & Chater, N. (2009). Transformation and alignment in similarity. Cognition, 113, 62 - 79.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部