期刊文献+

介入治疗后应用改良弹性绷带包扎股动脉止血效果观察 被引量:8

介入治疗后应用改良弹性绷带包扎股动脉止血效果观察
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察介入治疗后应用改良弹力绷带包扎股动脉的止血效果。方法将458例患者随机分为实验组和对照组,其中实验组240例,对照组218例,对照组采用两条弹性绷带交叉粘贴包扎股动脉,实验组采用改良弹力绷带包扎法,即在对照组基础上增加第三条弹性绷带包扎,第三条弹力绷带在两条绷带的交叉点上横跨粘贴包扎,比较两组患者的股动脉的止血效果及舒适度。结果实验组止血有效率为99.6%,对照组为93.6%,两组比较,P<0.005,差异有统计学意义;实验组患者在主观节制饮水、烦躁、排尿恐惧、腰酸背痛、纱块移位等不良反应较对照组明显减轻,均P<0.001,差异有统计学意义。结论改良弹力绷带包扎法对介入治疗后股动脉止血效果明显优于对照组,并能减少术后并发症,增加患者舒适度。 Objective To evaluate the hemostasis effectiveness of elasticity bandaging on puncture points in interventional therapy. Methods 458 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Two elastic crossed bandaging was used in the control group. A new pressurized bandaging with three elastic bandages on the basement of the method of control group was used in the observation group. The hemostasis effectiveness of on puncture points in interventional therapy and the comforts of patients were compared. Results The effective rate was 99. 6% in the observation group and 93.6% in the control group. Apprehensions and insomnias of patients in the control group were more than those in the observation group. The side effects of patients in the observation group, such as refusing drinking, agitation, fears of urination, muscle pain and gauzes movement were less than those in the control group (P 〈 0.01 ). All indicated the reduction of the side effects and more comforts. Conclusion The hemostasis effectiveness of new elasticity bandaging in the observation group was better than that in the control group. Furthermore it could reduce the post-operative complications and bring the patients more comforts.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2007年第3期53-55,共3页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 弹力绷带 介入 股动脉 穿刺 包扎法 elastic bandage interventional therapy puncture in femoral artery bandaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘启明,周胜华,祁述善,沈向前,赵延恕,刘明辉,陈琳,方臻飞,胡信群.心导管术后假性动脉瘤六例的诊断和治疗[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2001,9(4):177-178. 被引量:8
  • 2Smith SC, Dove JT, Kern MJ, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,37:2215-223
  • 3Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, et al. Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutative population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,55:8-13.
  • 4Wetter DR, Rickli H, von Smekal A, et al. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions wit the use of suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2000,11:1033-1037.
  • 5Kornowski R, Brandes S, Teplitsky I, et al. Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. J Invasive Cardiol, 2002,14:741-745.
  • 6Sprouse LR, Botta DM, Hamilton IN. The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure devices. J Vasc Surg, 2002,33:688-693.
  • 7Mehta H, Fleisch M, Chatterjee T, et al. Novel femoral artery puncture closure device in patients undergoing interventional and dignostic cardiac procedures. J Invasive Cardiol, 2002,14:9-12.
  • 8Rinder MR, Tamirisa PK, Taniuchi M, et al. Safety and efficacy of suture-mediated closure after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2001,54:146-151.
  • 9卢才义 见:卢才义 主编.心血管介入基本工具[A].见:卢才义,主编.临床心血管介入操作技术:第1版[C].北京:科学出版社,2002.49-86.
  • 10李菲,刘莹,张进,曹荣.股动脉穿刺并发假性动脉瘤5例的护理[J].解放军护理杂志,2001,18(1):49-49. 被引量:14

共引文献61

同被引文献52

引证文献8

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部